Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Packer

Ophthalmology Boulder, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1205834439 CMS profile 54780

1400 Bluebell Ave, Boulder, CO 80302

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,460,193

206 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$404,700

Paid to them · 12 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$701,255

18 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,108,284 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Mark Packer of Boulder, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,460,193 across 206 general payments and $404,700 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,108,284 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $701,255 across 18 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

16 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $425,343 25
2024 General $359,061 23
2023 General $423,561 35
2023 Research $164,100 1
2022 General $314,029 27
2021 General $545,575 22
2020 General $704,190 30
2020 Research $196,350 8
2019 General $688,434 44
2019 Research $44,250 3
2024 Ownership $236,806 3
2023 Ownership $233,525 3
2022 Ownership $221,816 3
2021 Ownership $3,130 4
2020 Ownership $3,064 3
2019 Ownership $2,914 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Packer
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Packer were reported at $425,343. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Mark Packer Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $688,434 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $704,190 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $545,575 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $314,029 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $423,561 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $359,061 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $425,343 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lensar, Inc. $1,447,464 89 payments
  2. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $950,218 43 payments
  3. Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. $465,681 4 payments
  4. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $347,050 36 payments
  5. Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited $94,329 9 payments
  6. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $62,875 14 payments
  7. Visant Medical, Inc. $47,209 4 payments
  8. Alcon Research LLC $45,325 6 payments
  9. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. $42 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $3,446,473 178 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $6,400 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $4,042 5 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $3,278 21 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LENSAR LASER SYSTEM $1,447,464 89 payments
  2. TRULIGN TORIC $762,150 21 payments
  3. ENVISTA $762,150 21 payments
  4. MULTI-FOCAL LENS $331,200 11 payments
  5. LOTEMAX $331,200 11 payments
  6. BIOTRUE $331,200 11 payments
  7. PODEYE TORIC IOL $168,519 1 payment
  8. Trulign IOL $84,600 8 payments
  9. Omidria $71,500 4 payments
  10. AcrySof $45,325 6 payments
  11. Other $125,364 40 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch Health US, LLC $240,600 11 payments
  2. Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. $164,100 1 payment

Records

218 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record