Who Paid My Doc
Mark Looney
Internal Medicine San Francisco, CA Medical Doctor
NPI 1386692721 CMS profile 687931
513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143
General payments
$128,476
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2022, Mark Looney of San Francisco, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $128,476 across 22 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
3 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | General | $120,532 | 19 | |
| 2021 | General | $7,444 | 2 | |
| 2019 | General | $500 | 1 |
Beside peers
- Mark Looney
- Internal Medicine median
- Middle half of Internal Medicine
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Looney were reported at $0. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.
Show as a table
| Year | Mark Looney | Internal Medicine median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $500 | $159 | $48–$570 | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | $119 | $33–$402 | $114 |
| 2021 | $7,444 | $135 | $37–$521 | $132 |
| 2022 | $120,532 | $141 | $42–$496 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $149 | $45–$519 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $154 | $47–$537 | $164 |
| 2025 | $0 | $156 | $47–$551 | $169 |
Breakdown
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$24,820
Medicare patients
99
Services billed
191
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 52% | |
| COPD | 52% | |
| Heart failure | 48% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 47% | |
| Depression | 47% | |
| Diabetes | 46% | |
| Arthritis | 44% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
22 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Internal Medicine in California
Andrew Cheng
Internal Medicine · South San Francisco, CA
Tung Ngo
Internal Medicine · Newport Beach, CA
Christian Eversull
Internal Medicine · Stanford, CA
Christian Sandrock
Internal Medicine · Sacramento, CA
Hatim Husain
Internal Medicine · San Diego, CA
Teck Ling
Internal Medicine · Palo Alto, CA
Related records
Internal Medicine in California
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Internal Medicine
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in California
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.