Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Lagatta

Nephrology Winter Park, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1821081985 CMS profile 354826

4100 Metric Dr, Suite 200, Winter Park, FL 32792

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,425

750 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$77,708 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2022

Through program year 2025, Mark Lagatta of Winter Park, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,425 across 750 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $77,708 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,858 137
2024 General $3,106 157
2023 General $2,679 131
2022 General $2,324 104
2021 General $1,805 95
2020 General $1,326 70
2019 General $1,327 56

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Lagatta
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Lagatta were reported at $2,858. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Mark Lagatta Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,327 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $1,326 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $1,805 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $2,324 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $2,679 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $3,106 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $2,858 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Retrophin, Inc. $3,042 183 payments
  2. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $2,407 91 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,424 64 payments
  4. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $1,020 59 payments
  5. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $752 31 payments
  6. Relypsa, Inc. $699 43 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC $657 29 payments
  8. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $598 29 payments
  9. OPKO Pharmaceuticals, LLC $469 25 payments
  10. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $451 19 payments
  11. Other $3,906 177 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,587 730 payments
  2. Education $838 20 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ACTHAR Immunology $2,219 87 payments
  2. LOKELMA $1,101 46 payments
  3. LUPKYNIS $1,020 59 payments
  4. Kerendia $752 31 payments
  5. ACTHAR Autoimmune And Rare Disease $657 29 payments
  6. TARPEYO $478 24 payments
  7. JYNARQUE $404 17 payments
  8. RAYALDEE $395 22 payments
  9. KRYSTEXXA $389 27 payments
  10. Veltassa $385 24 payments
  11. Other $4,342 194 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 46 drugs

Part D claims

2,721

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$493,155

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

19.3%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Filspari Sparsentan Brand 12 $129,767
Veltassa Patiromer Calcium Sorbitex Brand 65 $90,250
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 64 $73,010
Xphozah Tenapanor Hcl Brand 11 $62,094
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 51 $54,081
Sps Sodium Polystyrene Sulfon/Sorb Brand 19 $17,972
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 14 $17,812
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 28 $6,992
Nifedipine Er Nifedipine Brand 195 $6,057
Bumetanide Generic 217 $4,686

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 46 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$643,899

Of which drugs: $11,890

Medicare patients

1,377

Average age 78

Services billed

15,574

653 women, 724 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Ischemic heart disease 57%
Diabetes 56%
Arthritis 54%
Heart failure 49%
Atrial fibrillation 43%
Depression 33%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, epoetin alfa, biosimilar, (retacrit) (for non-esrd use), 1000 units Q5106 Office 19 1,880 $9,510

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $287
$287 — —
IBSRELA
  • Ardelyx, Inc. $196
$196 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $194
$194 — —
TARPEYO
  • CALLIDITAS THERAPEUTICS US INC. $133
$133 — —
PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL
  • ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $125
$125 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

750 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record