Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Himes

Sports Medicine Farmington, NM Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1043571458 CMS profile 2238269

622 W Maple St, Ste B, Farmington, NM 87401

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,349

227 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Himes of Farmington, NM is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,349 across 227 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $556 27
2024 General $587 31
2023 General $645 32
2022 General $533 25
2021 General $939 50
2020 General $640 35
2019 General $449 27

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Himes
  • Sports Medicine median
  • Middle half of Sports Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Himes were reported at $556. Among 1,257 Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $114 and the middle half received between $39 and $293.

Show as a table
Year Mark Himes Sports Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $449 $119 $35–$362 $163
2020 $640 $77 $24–$275 $114
2021 $939 $104 $28–$340 $132
2022 $533 $94 $31–$272 $149
2023 $645 $91 $34–$271 $160
2024 $587 $126 $38–$294 $164
2025 $556 $114 $39–$293 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $688 36 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $491 22 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $422 23 payments
  4. Astellas Pharma US Inc $329 15 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $311 17 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $252 14 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $241 13 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $238 14 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $201 12 payments
  10. Amarin Pharma Inc. $161 8 payments
  11. Other $1,015 53 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,349 227 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XARELTO $307 16 payments
  2. BREZTRI $284 14 payments
  3. JARDIANCE $258 11 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $242 12 payments
  5. FARXIGA $237 8 payments
  6. Ozempic $201 12 payments
  7. UBRELVY $197 9 payments
  8. Veozah $180 7 payments
  9. MYRBETRIQ $150 8 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $142 9 payments
  11. Other $3,455 194 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 111 drugs

Part D claims

4,714

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$426,497

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

23.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 80 $106,245
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 78 $91,673
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 31 $41,997
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 27 $31,892
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 27 $24,474
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 17 $22,507
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 13 $8,007
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 13 $7,685
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 11 $7,459
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 18 $7,431

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 111 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 146 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$345,989

Of which drugs: $66,387

Medicare patients

723

Average age 73

Services billed

9,204

419 women, 304 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 43%
Diabetes 29%
Depression 18%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Atrial fibrillation 11%
COPD 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 141 141 $40,825
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 143 145 $11,785
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 64 66 $9,785
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 26 26 $548
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 105 654 $455
Injection, lidocaine hcl for intravenous infusion, 10 mg J2001 Office 14 16 $0

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $122
$122 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $75
$75 31 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $45
$45 78 —
PAXLOVID
  • PFIZER INC. $35
$35 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $31
$31 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

227 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Sports Medicine in New Mexico

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record