Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Higgins

Internal Medicine San Francisco, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1134193469 CMS profile 277993

45 Castro St Ste 421, San Francisco, CA 94114

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$75,325

1,499 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Higgins of San Francisco, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $75,325 across 1,499 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,181 190
2024 General $6,034 257
2023 General $4,495 212
2022 General $13,011 189
2021 General $10,610 161
2020 General $7,085 190
2019 General $29,909 300

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Higgins
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Higgins were reported at $4,181. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Mark Higgins Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $29,909 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $7,085 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $10,610 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $13,011 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $4,495 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $6,034 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $4,181 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $41,522 197 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $13,123 261 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,408 131 payments
  4. EMD Serono, Inc. $2,213 120 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,442 89 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,410 65 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,357 63 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $1,021 51 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $900 46 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $778 47 payments
  11. Other $9,152 429 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $33,443 20 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $30,914 1,464 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $7,310 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $3,451 10 payments
  5. Education $207 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Truvada $8,629 10 payments
  2. Descovy $7,429 10 payments
  3. Biktarvy $7,427 11 payments
  4. DOVATO $5,190 124 payments
  5. Ozempic $1,156 68 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $1,065 63 payments
  7. APRETUDE $1,057 34 payments
  8. CREON $1,016 56 payments
  9. SYMTUZA $935 47 payments
  10. CABENUVA $862 34 payments
  11. Other $24,369 1,219 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 201 drugs

Part D claims

12,134

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$9,594,227

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

40.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 409 $1,844,078
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 212 $879,026
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 251 $733,826
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 173 $569,739
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 254 $564,967
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 126 $526,355
Serostim Somatropin Brand 28 $508,524
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 105 $389,374
Genvoya Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen Brand 82 $360,145
Symtuza Darunavir/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alaf Brand 56 $353,043

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 201 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 39 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$82,092

Of which drugs: $9,952

Medicare patients

254

Average age 72

Services billed

840

51 women, 203 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 37%
Diabetes 25%
Depression 20%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Cancer 13%
Atrial fibrillation 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 31 36 $5,472
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 28 28 $2,291

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 51 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
APRETUDE
$594 — —
DOVATO
$455 173 —
CABENUVA
$411 12 —
Mytesi
$296 36 —
RUKOBIA
$251 34 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 51 with Patron

Records

1,499 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record