Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Douglas

Ophthalmology Mobile, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1679576516 CMS profile 1065606

2880 Dauphin St, Mobile, AL 36606

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,666

117 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Douglas of Mobile, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,666 across 117 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $548 20
2024 General $788 23
2023 General $1,946 24
2022 General $476 19
2021 General $234 9
2020 General $136 7
2019 General $538 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Douglas
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Douglas were reported at $548. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Mark Douglas Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $538 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $136 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $234 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $476 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $1,946 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $788 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $548 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $1,654 24 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $883 15 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $604 27 payments
  4. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $331 6 payments
  5. Genentech USA, Inc. $308 13 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $261 10 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $174 4 payments
  8. Dutch Ophthalmic, USA $111 3 payments
  9. Sight Sciences, Inc. $100 2 payments
  10. Coherus Biosciences Inc. $58 3 payments
  11. Other $181 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,466 116 payments
  2. Honoraria $1,200 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ILUVIEN Ophthalmology $1,507 18 payments
  2. EYLEA $576 10 payments
  3. OZURDEX Eye Care $488 21 payments
  4. Syfovre $310 5 payments
  5. EYLEA HD $307 5 payments
  6. VABYSMO $278 11 payments
  7. ILUVIEN treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients who have been previously treated with corticosteroid $177 8 payments
  8. OZURDEX Retina $173 11 payments
  9. VUITY $148 2 payments
  10. YUTIQ $147 6 payments
  11. Other $726 28 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

439

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$19,137

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

42.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 126 $5,228
Difluprednate Generic 36 $4,170
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 15 $3,947
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 22 $2,593
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 87 $1,275
Atropine Sulfate Generic 24 $815
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 22 $354
Latanoprost Generic 13 $303
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 62 $199
Gentamicin Sulfate Generic 14 $150

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,808,405

Of which drugs: $1,453,892

Medicare patients

1,084

Average age 78

Services billed

74,919

608 women, 476 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 40%
Diabetes 38%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Heart failure 20%
Cancer 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 141 1,448 $944,866
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 24 7,860 $215,927
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 23 736 $194,874
Chloroprocaine hcl ophthalmic, 3% gel, 1 mg J2403 Office 52 58,400 $29,994
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 100 407 $21,602

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $176
$176 — —
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $141
$141 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $122
$122 — 736
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $95
$95 — 7,860
ILUVIEN
  • Alimera Sciences, Inc. $73
$73 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

117 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record