Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Diamond

Neurology Morristown, NJ Medical Doctor

NPI 1073514113 CMS profile 820601

95 Madison Avenue, Suite A6, Morristown, NJ 07960

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$93,411

1,198 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Diamond of Morristown, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $93,411 across 1,198 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,951 107
2024 General $4,820 134
2023 General $8,298 149
2022 General $21,818 202
2021 General $39,943 278
2020 General $14,474 157
2019 General $2,107 171

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Diamond
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Diamond were reported at $1,951. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Mark Diamond Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,107 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $14,474 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $39,943 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $21,818 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $8,298 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $4,820 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $1,951 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $30,426 192 payments
  2. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $20,719 57 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $15,424 88 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $14,289 37 payments
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,494 113 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $912 84 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $788 52 payments
  8. Biogen, Inc. $564 35 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $557 36 payments
  10. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $542 24 payments
  11. Other $7,695 480 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $74,042 44 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $18,033 1,130 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,020 18 payments
  4. Education $315 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $35,008 94 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $32,513 113 payments
  3. UBRELVY Neuroscience $11,520 30 payments
  4. QULIPTA $6,732 69 payments
  5. ZEPOSIA $841 33 payments
  6. AJOVY $722 61 payments
  7. BOTOX $716 45 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT Pain $578 40 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $544 34 payments
  10. ZAVZPRET $509 34 payments
  11. Other $11,240 784 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 73 drugs

Part D claims

2,952

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,129,976

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

28.2%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Soliris Eculizumab Brand 12 $616,213
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 27 $151,071
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 12 $66,623
Dimethyl Fumarate Generic 11 $32,161
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 18 $22,400
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 27 $19,894
Teriflunomide Generic 23 $19,799
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 15 $18,921
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 11 $14,781
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 11 $13,330

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 73 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$320,152

Of which drugs: $185,618

Medicare patients

792

Average age 76

Services billed

38,693

447 women, 345 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Depression 30%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Osteoporosis 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 77 37,388 $185,617

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
$2,807 11 —
ZEPOSIA
$283 — —
INGREZZA
$159 — —
BOTOX
$154 11 37,388
BRIUMVI
$119 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

1,198 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record