Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Demoss

Pediatrics Greer, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1538172960 CMS profile 24385

501C Memorial Dr Ext, Greer, SC 29651

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,973

171 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Demoss of Greer, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,973 across 171 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $76 4
2024 General $339 19
2023 General $585 30
2022 General $587 36
2021 General $625 38
2020 General $337 21
2019 General $424 23

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Demoss
  • Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Demoss were reported at $76. Among 22,296 Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $97 and the middle half received between $37 and $210.

Show as a table
Year Mark Demoss Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $424 $86 $31–$183 $163
2020 $337 $49 $22–$110 $114
2021 $625 $68 $27–$158 $132
2022 $587 $77 $30–$173 $149
2023 $585 $88 $33–$190 $160
2024 $339 $94 $34–$206 $164
2025 $76 $97 $37–$210 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc. $777 49 payments
  2. Tris Pharma Inc $439 23 payments
  3. Corium, Inc. $335 20 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $317 15 payments
  5. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $274 12 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $141 9 payments
  7. Neos Therapeutics, LP $136 8 payments
  8. Cranial Technologies, Inc $105 6 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $85 6 payments
  10. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $71 5 payments
  11. Other $294 18 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,973 171 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JORNAY PM Central Nervous Stimulant ADHD $498 32 payments
  2. Azstarys $335 20 payments
  3. BEXSERO $286 12 payments
  4. QELBREE $238 10 payments
  5. JORNAY PM Central Nervous System Stimulant $205 12 payments
  6. Dyanavel XR Adhd $179 8 payments
  7. VYVANSE $160 9 payments
  8. Doc Band $105 6 payments
  9. COTEMPLA XR-ODT $103 6 payments
  10. Dyanavel XR Adhd $86 5 payments
  11. Other $1,223 82 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

171 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pediatrics in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record