Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Bonner

Family Medicine Fayetteville, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1437188869 CMS profile 945161

2630 E Citizens Dr Ste 13, Fayetteville, AR 72703

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,222

738 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mark Bonner of Fayetteville, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,222 across 738 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,515 73
2024 General $1,216 64
2023 General $1,768 100
2022 General $1,477 99
2021 General $1,994 140
2020 General $2,154 169
2019 General $1,097 93

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Bonner
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Bonner were reported at $1,515. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Mark Bonner Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,097 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,154 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $1,994 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $1,477 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $1,768 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $1,216 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,515 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,219 66 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,216 51 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,159 95 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $562 73 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $555 34 payments
  6. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $533 46 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $459 30 payments
  8. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $366 15 payments
  9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $315 30 payments
  10. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $311 22 payments
  11. Other $4,528 276 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,207 735 payments
  2. Education $15 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,118 91 payments
  2. FARXIGA $804 22 payments
  3. QULIPTA $629 29 payments
  4. BREZTRI $558 10 payments
  5. UBRELVY $535 31 payments
  6. FreeStyle Libre $452 28 payments
  7. Ozempic $371 24 payments
  8. REXULTI $366 15 payments
  9. RYBELSUS $341 22 payments
  10. AIRSUPRA $335 7 payments
  11. Other $8,582 583 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 214 drugs

Part D claims

19,002

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$917,120

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

19%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 163 $169,820
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 152 $123,137
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 88 $91,213
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 68 $46,709
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 47 $35,387
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 47 $33,961
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 29 $32,993
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 30 $29,265
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 28 $25,623
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 20 $22,920

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 214 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$107,580

Of which drugs: $3,043

Medicare patients

537

Average age 73

Services billed

14,913

307 women, 230 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Diabetes 20%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Cancer 15%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Heart failure 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 65 12,201 $1,235
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 14 14 $960
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 43 104 $402
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 19 440 $36
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 28 124 $35

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $165
$165 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $103
$103 — —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $49
  • Lundbeck LLC $37
$85 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $85
$85 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $74
$74 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

738 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record