Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mark Boguniewicz

Allergy Denver, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1790796555 CMS profile 217821

1400 Jackson St, Denver, CO 80206

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$813,807

669 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$88,085

Paid to them · 129 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$257,025 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Mark Boguniewicz of Denver, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $813,807 across 669 general payments and $88,085 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $257,025 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Allergy profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $41,971 59
2025 Research $2,760 5
2024 General $85,977 71
2024 Research $12,414 21
2023 General $109,172 76
2023 Research $11,367 27
2022 General $85,967 66
2022 Research $17,258 15
2021 General $103,513 45
2021 Research $19,229 19
2020 General $100,789 58
2020 Research $15,473 17
2019 General $286,417 294
2019 Research $9,584 25

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mark Boguniewicz
  • Allergy median
  • Middle half of Allergy
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mark Boguniewicz were reported at $41,971. Among 526 Allergy profiles paid that year, the median was $1,143 and the middle half received between $226 and $2,504.

Show as a table
Year Mark Boguniewicz Allergy median Middle half National median
2019 $286,417 $506 $151–$1,337 $163
2020 $100,789 $409 $108–$1,162 $114
2021 $103,513 $549 $125–$1,485 $132
2022 $85,967 $666 $161–$1,594 $149
2023 $109,172 $780 $186–$1,916 $160
2024 $85,977 $1,031 $271–$2,196 $164
2025 $41,971 $1,143 $226–$2,504 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $170,772 157 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $157,848 82 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $75,242 99 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $61,049 32 payments
  5. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $60,955 23 payments
  6. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $55,092 38 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $45,225 54 payments
  8. LEO Pharma Inc. $43,272 21 payments
  9. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $38,719 50 payments
  10. Incyte Corporation $25,382 25 payments
  11. Other $80,251 88 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $534,088 157 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $130,497 222 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $109,620 28 payments
  4. Honoraria $26,075 11 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $13,527 251 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $225,486 193 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Immunology $120,893 45 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $40,068 35 payments
  4. TAPINAROF $28,985 33 payments
  5. EUCRISA $22,858 12 payments
  6. NO PRODUCT DISCUSSED $17,665 10 payments
  7. CIBINQO $14,273 6 payments
  8. OPZELURA $12,706 21 payments
  9. VTAMA $11,412 29 payments
  10. RINVOQ $9,509 15 payments
  11. Other $18,761 45 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $58,325 93 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $23,010 21 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $6,750 15 payments

Records

798 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Allergy in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record