Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marie Labadie-Degennaro

Nurse Practitioner, Family Tampa, FL Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1053808790 CMS profile 10808113

13330 Usf Laurel Dr, Tampa, FL 33612

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$65,987

445 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marie Labadie-Degennaro of Tampa, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $65,987 across 445 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $22,385 150
2024 General $19,024 101
2023 General $4,854 45
2022 General $11,253 56
2021 General $8,471 93

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marie Labadie-Degennaro
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marie Labadie-Degennaro were reported at $22,385. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Marie Labadie-Degennaro Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $8,471 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $11,253 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $4,854 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $19,024 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $22,385 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $33,791 141 payments
  2. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $10,477 36 payments
  3. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $7,419 46 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $6,356 85 payments
  5. Impel Pharmaceuticals LLC $3,131 18 payments
  6. Lundbeck LLC $1,806 15 payments
  7. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $890 31 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $611 24 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $376 15 payments
  10. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $352 12 payments
  11. Other $778 22 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $43,825 28 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $10,503 395 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $8,960 19 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,700 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UBRELVY $22,866 109 payments
  2. QULIPTA $21,109 81 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $17,896 82 payments
  4. NURTEC ODT Pain $6,251 82 payments
  5. TRUDHESA $3,131 18 payments
  6. VYEPTI $1,690 12 payments
  7. ZAVZPRET $879 66 payments
  8. AIMOVIG $626 25 payments
  9. AJOVY $521 26 payments
  10. Austedo XR $286 3 payments
  11. Other $2,075 80 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

1,894

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$1,208,063

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

56.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 249 $412,584
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 250 $391,260
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 163 $128,676
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 103 $128,324
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 70 $75,977
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 15 $19,398
Reyvow Lasmiditan Succinate Brand 25 $18,539
Ajovy Syringe Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 13 $11,717
Sumatriptan Succinate Generic 30 $6,829
Oxcarbazepine Generic 18 $1,424

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$236,463

Of which drugs: $199,329

Medicare patients

144

Average age 66

Services billed

41,877

121 women, 23 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 65%
High blood pressure 63%
Depression 48%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Osteoporosis 23%
COPD 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 69 41,380 $199,323

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $9,719
$9,719 249 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $8,065
$8,065 103 —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $228
$228 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $155
$155 15 41,380
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $142
$142 250 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

445 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record