Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mariam Mathai

Retina Specialist Greenbelt, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1346694668 CMS profile 5703405

7501 Greenway Center Dr # 300, Greenbelt, MD 20770

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,204

67 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mariam Mathai of Greenbelt, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,204 across 67 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 60th percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,142 16
2024 General $680 14
2023 General $885 17
2022 General $728 7
2021 General $463 4
2020 General $60 3
2019 General $247 6

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mariam Mathai
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mariam Mathai were reported at $1,142. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Mariam Mathai Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $247 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $60 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $463 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $728 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $885 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $680 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $1,142 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $618 17 payments
  2. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $483 9 payments
  3. Alcon Vision LLC $466 6 payments
  4. Genentech USA, Inc. $414 4 payments
  5. Neurotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $412 2 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $278 7 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $226 7 payments
  8. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $206 2 payments
  9. Genentech, Inc. $150 1 payment
  10. TissueTech, Inc. $148 1 payment
  11. Other $803 11 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,204 67 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EYLEA $374 10 payments
  2. Syfovre $305 7 payments
  3. SUSVIMO $277 2 payments
  4. Izervay $259 6 payments
  5. EYLEA HD $245 7 payments
  6. Constellation $218 2 payments
  7. Cequa $206 2 payments
  8. OZURDEX $193 6 payments
  9. VABYSMO $154 2 payments
  10. PROKERA $148 1 payment
  11. Other $1,662 21 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

200

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$7,411

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

20.5%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 75 $4,479
Bromfenac Sodium Generic 11 $1,313
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 13 $363
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 26 $349
Ofloxacin Generic 24 $334
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 16 $284
Latanoprost Generic 20 $148
Erythromycin Erythromycin Base Brand 15 $139

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,574,466

Of which drugs: $1,195,432

Medicare patients

647

Average age 77

Services billed

13,770

393 women, 254 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 19%
Osteoporosis 18%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 114 916 $603,701
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 50 1,128 $296,822
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 18 5,160 $141,845
Injection, dexamethasone, intravitreal implant, 0.1 mg J7312 Office 13 217 $34,978

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $175
$175 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $102
$102 — 1,128
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $67
$67 — —
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $26
$26 — 5,160
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $16
$16 — 217

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

67 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record