Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Margo Klingensmith

Physician Assistant Naples, FL Physician Assistant

NPI 1831443530 CMS profile 11309763

1735 Sw Health Pkwy Ste 201, Naples, FL 34109

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,918

229 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Margo Klingensmith of Naples, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,918 across 229 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $885 42
2024 General $1,333 64
2023 General $1,407 66
2022 General $1,292 57

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Margo Klingensmith
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Margo Klingensmith were reported at $885. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Margo Klingensmith Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $0 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,292 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $1,407 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $1,333 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $885 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $749 43 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $678 27 payments
  3. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $479 19 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $383 14 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $378 22 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $309 16 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $286 11 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $204 11 payments
  9. Medtronic, Inc. $167 2 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $167 6 payments
  11. Other $1,117 58 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,918 229 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. GEMTESA $556 23 payments
  2. Ozempic $521 20 payments
  3. ELIQUIS $517 32 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $450 21 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $407 25 payments
  6. Otezla $331 19 payments
  7. Kerendia $286 11 payments
  8. PREVNAR 20 $232 11 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $217 12 payments
  10. Repatha $196 11 payments
  11. Other $3,272 157 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 69 drugs

Part D claims

2,260

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$134,485

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

18.9%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 29 $35,618
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 22 $29,372
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 15 $23,722
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 20 $16,837
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 14 $6,238
Rosuvastatin Calcium Generic 74 $1,322
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 62 $1,100
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 86 $928
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 91 $892
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 65 $890

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 69 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 79 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$86,127

Of which drugs: $550

Medicare patients

639

Average age 79

Services billed

3,868

393 women, 246 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Ischemic heart disease 42%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Osteoporosis 24%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Diabetes 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 11 48 $26

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $228
$228 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $120
$120 — —
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $69
$69 22 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $69
$69 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $61
$61 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

229 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record