Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marcus Smith

Interventional Cardiology Oklahoma City, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1578769055 CMS profile 26531

3200 Quail Springs Pkwy, Suite 200, Oklahoma City, OK 73134

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$67,295

581 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marcus Smith of Oklahoma City, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $67,295 across 581 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Interventional Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $619 31
2024 General $1,237 41
2023 General $1,136 56
2022 General $1,367 86
2021 General $2,563 140
2020 General $7,576 87
2019 General $52,797 140

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marcus Smith
  • Interventional Cardiology median
  • Middle half of Interventional Cardiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marcus Smith were reported at $619. Among 6,173 Interventional Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,092 and the middle half received between $366 and $3,019.

Show as a table
Year Marcus Smith Interventional Cardiology median Middle half National median
2019 $52,797 $1,097 $329–$3,048 $163
2020 $7,576 $473 $161–$1,480 $114
2021 $2,563 $677 $233–$1,827 $132
2022 $1,367 $978 $333–$2,724 $149
2023 $1,136 $1,136 $382–$2,986 $160
2024 $1,237 $1,181 $395–$3,326 $164
2025 $619 $1,092 $366–$3,019 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $37,966 36 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $19,425 23 payments
  3. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $1,818 101 payments
  4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,280 93 payments
  5. Amarin Pharma Inc. $726 59 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $663 33 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $596 15 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $484 24 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $466 24 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $400 17 payments
  11. Other $3,472 156 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $51,075 31 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $10,094 537 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $5,620 4 payments
  4. Education $288 7 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $218 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JARDIANCE Diabetes $37,096 35 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $19,425 23 payments
  3. LifeVest $1,818 101 payments
  4. XARELTO $1,280 93 payments
  5. PRADAXA $951 5 payments
  6. Vascepa $601 47 payments
  7. Repatha $464 23 payments
  8. Ozempic $410 21 payments
  9. CARDIOMEMS $391 3 payments
  10. VERQUVO $374 33 payments
  11. Other $5,718 259 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 57 drugs

Part D claims

7,106

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 2,236

Drug cost

$1,277,723

Median for Interventional Cardiology: $380,412

Branded share of claims

27.2%

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 27.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 753 $735,849
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 142 $167,554
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 166 $160,480
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 102 $78,871
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 33 $19,934
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 20 $14,804
Nebivolol Hcl Generic 122 $7,382
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 528 $7,045
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 570 $6,411
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 12 $5,614

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 57 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 4,694 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 80 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,507,675

Of which drugs: $12,851

Medicare patients

1,681

Average age 74

Services billed

9,900

871 women, 810 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 56%
Arthritis 55%
Diabetes 31%
Atrial fibrillation 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 20%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 585 2,348 $12,851

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $43
  • PFIZER INC. $13
$56 753 —
CAMZYOS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $50
$50 — —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $46
$46 102 —
Inpefa
  • Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $35
$35 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $33
$33 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

581 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record