Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marcus Sandling

Infectious Disease Brooklyn, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1396001418 CMS profile 2787188

40 Flatbush Avenue Ext Fl 3, Fl 4, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$156,792

216 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marcus Sandling of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $156,792 across 216 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $81,917 97
2024 General $68,296 81
2023 General $641 6
2020 General $5,486 10
2019 General $453 22

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marcus Sandling
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marcus Sandling were reported at $81,917. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Marcus Sandling Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $453 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $5,486 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $0 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $0 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $641 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $68,296 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $81,917 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ViiV Healthcare Company $112,427 134 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $43,249 65 payments
  3. Bavarian Nordic A/S $750 1 payment
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $171 10 payments
  5. Janssen Products, LP $121 1 payment
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $73 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $103,815 33 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $26,220 14 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $20,153 50 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $6,604 119 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. APRETUDE Hiv $57,035 49 payments
  2. APRETUDE Hiv $46,799 46 payments
  3. Descovy $16,291 20 payments
  4. Yeztugo $13,808 13 payments
  5. CABENUVA $2,638 3 payments
  6. DOVATO $2,629 3 payments
  7. Biktarvy $956 4 payments
  8. JYNNEOS $750 1 payment
  9. SYMTUZA $221 7 payments
  10. PIFELTRO $73 5 payments
  11. Other $321 20 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

137

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$394,665

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

83.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 50 $222,158
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 25 $74,044
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 16 $60,476
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 11 $37,303
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 12 $447
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 23 $237

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $56,879
$56,879 — —
CABENUVA
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $2,620
$2,620 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

216 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Infectious Disease in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record