Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marcus Goodman

Dermatology Roswell, GA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1407075880 CMS profile 17772

2500 Hospital Blvd Ste 280, Roswell, GA 30076

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$64,598

1,810 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marcus Goodman of Roswell, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $64,598 across 1,810 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,402 255
2024 General $16,304 287
2023 General $17,666 273
2022 General $11,418 290
2021 General $4,209 233
2020 General $2,864 198
2019 General $3,737 274

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marcus Goodman
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marcus Goodman were reported at $8,402. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Marcus Goodman Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,737 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $2,864 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $4,209 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $11,418 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $17,666 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $16,304 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $8,402 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $18,986 100 payments
  2. LEO Pharma Inc. $12,140 152 payments
  3. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $5,848 156 payments
  4. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $4,519 34 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $3,534 218 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $3,150 100 payments
  7. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $2,365 186 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $1,638 126 payments
  9. Journey Medical Corporation $1,453 89 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $1,318 46 payments
  11. Other $9,648 603 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $34,935 15 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $29,189 1,788 payments
  3. Education $385 6 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $90 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TAPINAROF $9,750 3 payments
  2. VTAMA $9,515 106 payments
  3. ADBRY $7,569 101 payments
  4. TREMFYA $3,127 79 payments
  5. AKLIEF $2,718 57 payments
  6. ANZUPGO $2,499 3 payments
  7. SKYRIZI $2,282 153 payments
  8. NEMLUVIO $1,920 19 payments
  9. EUCRISA $1,392 105 payments
  10. CIBINQO $1,118 79 payments
  11. Other $24,571 1,578 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 46 drugs

Part D claims

7,167

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$771,432

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

4.7%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 18 $366,455
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 38 $135,839
Adbry Tralokinumab-Ldrm Brand 21 $78,403
Ketoconazole Generic 1,486 $21,860
Tacrolimus Generic 119 $19,574
Levulan Aminolevulinic Acid Hcl Brand 30 $14,271
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 379 $13,474
Pimecrolimus Generic 39 $11,621
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 13 $11,114
Fluorouracil Generic 162 $10,814

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 46 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$304,140

Of which drugs: $30,603

Medicare patients

2,550

Average age 74

Services billed

7,435

1,325 women, 1,225 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Diabetes 21%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Cancer 15%
Depression 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 77 99 $30,601

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TAPINAROF
$9,750 — —
ADBRY
$2,208 21 —
VTAMA
$881 — —
DUPIXENT
$409 38 —
Zoryve
$360 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

1,810 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record