Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marco Cavagna

Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Washington, DC Medical Doctor

NPI 1710144100 CMS profile 349627

110 Irving St Nw, Ste 113, Washington, DC 20010

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,567

158 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marco Cavagna of Washington, DC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,567 across 158 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 20th percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,738 42
2024 General $961 23
2023 General $410 17
2022 General $194 12
2021 General $464 25
2020 General $227 14
2019 General $573 25

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marco Cavagna
  • Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marco Cavagna were reported at $1,738. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.

Show as a table
Year Marco Cavagna Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $573 $2,361 $585–$8,260 $163
2020 $227 $993 $247–$4,351 $114
2021 $464 $1,185 $326–$4,739 $132
2022 $194 $2,073 $554–$6,789 $149
2023 $410 $2,568 $759–$8,159 $160
2024 $961 $2,557 $703–$7,403 $164
2025 $1,738 $2,462 $733–$7,710 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $2,651 69 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $603 21 payments
  3. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $370 26 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $212 8 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $154 4 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $145 9 payments
  7. Biosense Webster, Inc. $129 1 payment
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $59 4 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $49 3 payments
  10. Amarin Pharma Inc. $34 2 payments
  11. Other $161 11 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,399 151 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,087 6 payments
  3. Education $81 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AVEIR Structural Heart $1,045 8 payments
  2. LifeVest $370 26 payments
  3. AVEIR Cardiac Rhythm Management $298 3 payments
  4. ENSITE $277 10 payments
  5. ACCOLADE SR $210 12 payments
  6. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $154 4 payments
  7. TACTICATH ABLATION CATHETER, SENSOR ENABLED $131 6 payments
  8. Carto 3 $129 1 payment
  9. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $125 8 payments
  10. WATCHMAN $123 1 payment
  11. Other $1,795 86 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 18 drugs

Part D claims

981

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 1,090

Drug cost

$174,788

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: $354,841

Branded share of claims

32.9%

Median for Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: 38.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 183 $128,226
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 31 $22,949
Dofetilide Generic 34 $9,337
Flecainide Acetate Generic 140 $2,861
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 185 $2,401
Mexiletine Hcl Generic 18 $1,664
Diltiazem 24hr Er (La) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 26 $1,581
Amiodarone Hcl Generic 48 $1,132
Acebutolol Hcl Generic 17 $1,055
Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl Brand 44 $683

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 18 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 72 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$133,175

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

803

Average age 76

Services billed

1,339

340 women, 463 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Atrial fibrillation 65%
Ischemic heart disease 52%
Arthritis 50%
Heart failure 43%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
COPD 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ELIQUIS
  • PFIZER INC. $29
$29 183 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

158 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in District of Columbia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record