Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marc Nolan

Rheumatology Woodbury, MN Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1679916837 CMS profile 5042950

4040 Radio Dr, Woodbury, MN 55129

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$30

1 record reported · program year 2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program year 2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Marc Nolan of Woodbury, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $30 across 1 general payment and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 4th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $30 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marc Nolan
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marc Nolan were reported at $30. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Marc Nolan Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $0 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $0 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $0 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $30 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $30 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2025
  1. Food and Beverage $30 1 payment
Products named General payments · program year 2025
  1. EVENITY $30 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

1,380

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,664,674

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

33.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 63 $460,719
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 46 $350,670
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 35 $293,644
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 30 $217,508
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 17 $111,532
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 19 $106,770
Olumiant Baricitinib Brand 16 $54,722
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 12 $28,705
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 234 $10,512
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 207 $7,369

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$262,981

Of which drugs: $232,967

Medicare patients

175

Average age 70

Services billed

19,480

121 women, 54 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 60%
Osteoporosis 26%
Depression 24%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Diabetes 15%
Heart failure 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 15 2,050 $69,664
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 18 1,160 $28,967
Injection, infliximab-abda, biosimilar, (renflexis), 10 mg Q5104 Office 15 930 $21,917
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 14 524 $122

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

1 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record