Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Marc Meth

Clinical & Laboratory Immunology Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1508013301 CMS profile 159258

2080 Century Park E Ste 810, Los Angeles, CA 90067

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,089

505 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$10,800 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Marc Meth of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,089 across 505 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $10,800 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,311 89
2024 General $2,334 78
2023 General $2,424 107
2022 General $2,956 78
2021 General $1,256 55
2020 General $1,793 44
2019 General $8,015 54

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Marc Meth
  • Clinical & Laboratory Immunology median
  • Middle half of Clinical & Laboratory Immunology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Marc Meth were reported at $2,311. Among 29 Clinical & Laboratory Immunology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,390 and the middle half received between $253 and $4,477.

Show as a table
Year Marc Meth Clinical & Laboratory Immunology median Middle half National median
2019 $8,015 $817 $217–$3,046 $163
2020 $1,793 $737 $162–$8,300 $114
2021 $1,256 $1,465 $237–$4,590 $132
2022 $2,956 $712 $154–$2,965 $149
2023 $2,424 $1,068 $137–$2,555 $160
2024 $2,334 $448 $138–$2,532 $164
2025 $2,311 $1,390 $253–$4,477 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Dermira, Inc. $5,463 3 payments
  2. Genzyme Corporation $2,464 53 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $2,151 84 payments
  4. Grifols USA, LLC $1,488 6 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,148 37 payments
  6. OptiNose US, Inc. $1,095 16 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $998 49 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $887 27 payments
  9. CSL Behring $799 39 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $713 40 payments
  11. Other $3,883 151 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,773 497 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $8,299 6 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,017 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. QBREXZA $5,463 3 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $1,812 71 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,678 15 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,596 74 payments
  5. Xembify $1,488 6 payments
  6. Xhance $1,095 16 payments
  7. Hizentra $766 38 payments
  8. NUCALA $682 19 payments
  9. RINVOQ $666 41 payments
  10. CIBINQO $579 34 payments
  11. Other $6,612 266 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

912

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 449

Drug cost

$437,381

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: $169,700

Branded share of claims

29.4%

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 37.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 60 $238,997
Nucala Mepolizumab Brand 26 $111,313
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 29 $20,418
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 17 $17,364
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 28 $9,766
Dulera Mometasone/Formoterol Brand 20 $7,105
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 16 $6,266
Anoro Ellipta Umeclidinium Brm/Vilanterol Tr Brand 12 $5,598
Odactra Mite,d.Farinae-D.Pteronyssinus Brand 16 $5,513
Breyna Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 16 $3,136

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,579 Part D prescribers listed as Allergy/ Immunology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$49,844

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

221

Average age 75

Services billed

3,369

124 women, 97 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 52%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Osteoporosis 27%
Diabetes 23%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Cancer 15%
Depression 12%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $452
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $111
$563 60 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $131
$131 — —
Hizentra
  • CSL Behring $119
$119 — —
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $108
$108 — —
EUCRISA
  • PFIZER INC. $98
$98 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

505 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical & Laboratory Immunology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record