Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lynne Shaver

Physician Assistant Jane Lew, WV Physician Assistant

NPI 1104847615 CMS profile 10598186

533 Hackers Creek Rd, Jane Lew, WV 26378

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,280

356 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lynne Shaver of Jane Lew, WV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,280 across 356 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,073 65
2024 General $765 46
2023 General $1,075 72
2022 General $1,192 86
2021 General $1,175 87

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lynne Shaver
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lynne Shaver were reported at $1,073. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Lynne Shaver Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $1,175 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,192 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $1,075 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $765 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $1,073 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,007 74 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $950 58 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $641 41 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $465 33 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $360 27 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $344 24 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $299 19 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $277 18 payments
  9. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $228 14 payments
  10. Exact Sciences Corporation $219 15 payments
  11. Other $489 33 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,280 356 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. BREZTRI $581 35 payments
  2. LINZESS $572 44 payments
  3. Otezla $413 27 payments
  4. BELSOMRA $344 26 payments
  5. TRULICITY $342 25 payments
  6. Repatha $332 22 payments
  7. VIBERZI $282 21 payments
  8. Kerendia $277 18 payments
  9. Ozempic $269 17 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $268 18 payments
  11. Other $4,300 291 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 109 drugs

Part D claims

4,343

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$546,127

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

24.6%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 57 $80,687
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 47 $60,391
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 37 $51,441
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 33 $45,133
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 33 $32,437
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 26 $30,713
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 38 $30,553
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 24 $25,942
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 24 $24,345
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 27 $20,538

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 109 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,105

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

43

Average age 74

Services billed

139

30 women, 13 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 63%
Diabetes 30%
Chronic kidney disease 30%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 27 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $116
$116 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $81
$81 14 —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $68
$68 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $64
$64 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $41
$41 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 27 with Patron

Records

356 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in West Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record