Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lydia Shajenko

Clinical Neurophysiology Edgewater, NJ Medical Doctor

NPI 1841289634 CMS profile 310953

725 River Rd Ste 55, Edgewater, NJ 07020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$84,722

1,272 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lydia Shajenko of Edgewater, NJ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $84,722 across 1,272 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,239 83
2024 General $5,138 164
2023 General $11,713 217
2022 General $16,739 235
2021 General $26,805 242
2020 General $19,774 196
2019 General $3,315 135

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lydia Shajenko
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lydia Shajenko were reported at $1,239. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Lydia Shajenko Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,315 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $19,774 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $26,805 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $16,739 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $11,713 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $5,138 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $1,239 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $47,900 330 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $22,981 134 payments
  3. LivaNova USA, Inc. $1,661 16 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,084 97 payments
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,057 52 payments
  6. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,037 93 payments
  7. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $729 40 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $716 47 payments
  9. Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $657 11 payments
  10. Lundbeck LLC $618 40 payments
  11. Other $6,283 412 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $64,525 45 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $17,396 1,211 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2,613 11 payments
  4. Education $188 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY Neuroscience $37,789 156 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $14,524 71 payments
  3. QULIPTA $12,108 117 payments
  4. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $10,370 69 payments
  5. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $3,693 23 payments
  6. VNS Therapy $1,528 13 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT Pain $974 89 payments
  8. ZAVZPRET $934 82 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $930 64 payments
  10. Iovera $657 11 payments
  11. Other $10,453 695 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 49 drugs

Part D claims

1,488

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$722,888

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

26.9%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gammaplex Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga 0-50 Brand 11 $430,471
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 71 $104,348
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 36 $39,582
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 14 $34,971
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 21 $31,239
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 20 $22,318
Botox Onabotulinumtoxina Brand 15 $19,847
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 13 $15,076
Oxcarbazepine Generic 35 $3,510
Memantine Hcl Generic 105 $2,408

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 49 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 61 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$439,044

Of which drugs: $85,610

Medicare patients

118

Average age 68

Services billed

19,322

78 women, 40 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 55%
Diabetes 35%
Depression 32%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Osteoporosis 22%
Alzheimer's or dementia 19%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 26 17,300 $85,604

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
$2,970 71 —
QULIPTA
$222 36 —
ELYXYB - CELECOXIB
$202 — —
VYEPTI
$196 — —
VYVGART Hytrulo
$189 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

1,272 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in New Jersey

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record