Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Luis Dehesa

Dermatology Fresno, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1629412259 CMS profile 2040417

2335 E Kashian Ln Ste 410, Fresno, CA 93701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,387

147 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$261,099 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Luis Dehesa of Fresno, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,387 across 147 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $261,099 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 62nd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,369 108
2024 General $472 9
2023 General $746 21
2022 General $294 4
2021 General $96 1
2020 General $72 1
2019 General $338 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Luis Dehesa
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Luis Dehesa were reported at $2,369. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Luis Dehesa Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $338 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $72 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $96 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $294 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $746 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $472 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $2,369 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $920 10 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $582 29 payments
  3. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $428 19 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $409 17 payments
  5. Incyte Corporation $309 10 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $292 13 payments
  7. Organogenesis Inc. $216 8 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $194 4 payments
  9. LEO Pharma Inc. $175 11 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $131 3 payments
  11. Other $731 23 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,156 144 payments
  2. Education $230 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,114 14 payments
  2. SOTYKTU $409 17 payments
  3. Zoryve $310 18 payments
  4. OPZELURA $309 10 payments
  5. Otezla Inflammation $292 13 payments
  6. RINVOQ $284 12 payments
  7. Puraply $216 8 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $188 16 payments
  9. DUPIXENT $131 3 payments
  10. Otezla Dermatology $125 1 payment
  11. Other $837 33 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

2,644

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$3,348,360

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

15.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 51 $1,024,285
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 41 $384,981
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 24 $308,006
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 35 $283,734
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 13 $278,390
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 35 $257,284
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 61 $218,127
Otezla Apremilast Brand 29 $140,497
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 21 $128,898
Sotyktu Deucravacitinib Brand 13 $92,241

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 86 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$655,541

Of which drugs: $6,843

Medicare patients

1,017

Average age 72

Services billed

7,039

497 women, 520 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 42%
Arthritis 41%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Heart failure 18%
Depression 17%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 14 20 $6,202
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 39 189 $141

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $141
$141 24 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $109
$109 21 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $85
$85 29 —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $55
$55 13 —
VTAMA
  • Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $22
$22 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

147 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record