Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Luis De Armas

General Practice Miami, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1235329558 CMS profile 192460

11373 W Flagler St, Suite 213, Miami, FL 33174

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,038

247 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$207,905 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Luis De Armas of Miami, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,038 across 247 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $207,905 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $625 34
2024 General $917 43
2023 General $918 42
2022 General $635 28
2021 General $824 50
2020 General $412 27
2019 General $707 23

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Luis De Armas
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Luis De Armas were reported at $625. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Luis De Armas General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $707 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $412 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $824 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $635 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $918 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $917 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $625 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $1,658 98 payments
  2. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $604 23 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $519 31 payments
  4. Exact Sciences Corporation $452 21 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $347 11 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $239 8 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $182 9 payments
  8. AstraZeneca UK Limited $165 1 payment
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $151 9 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $145 7 payments
  11. Other $576 29 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,038 247 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XIFAXAN $1,459 96 payments
  2. Kerendia $604 23 payments
  3. Cologuard Collection Kit $434 20 payments
  4. XARELTO $347 11 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $230 14 payments
  6. TRULICITY $209 13 payments
  7. MOUNJARO $155 10 payments
  8. EUCRISA $152 4 payments
  9. TRULANCE $140 6 payments
  10. AIRSUPRA $110 5 payments
  11. Other $1,687 84 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 103 drugs

Part D claims

3,959

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$351,265

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

21.7%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 49 $54,635
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 44 $44,891
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 37 $38,783
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 32 $36,130
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 24 $25,394
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 22 $24,934
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 15 $19,309
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 16 $16,794
Synjardy Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 17 $15,969
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 13 $11,510

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 103 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$34,061

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

30

Average age 67

Services billed

483

17 women, 13 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Depression 60%
Diabetes 57%
Chronic kidney disease 53%
COPD 43%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $202
$202 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $138
$138 49 —
INGREZZA
  • Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $74
$74 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $67
$67 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $47
  • Lilly USA, LLC $20
$67 24 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

247 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other General Practice in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record