Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lucius Sams

Internal Medicine Pearl, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1003838699 CMS profile 136184

3011 Greenfield Rd, Pearl, MS 39208

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,112

393 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lucius Sams of Pearl, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,112 across 393 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $819 47
2024 General $560 34
2023 General $908 55
2022 General $649 41
2021 General $973 64
2020 General $676 46
2019 General $1,527 106

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lucius Sams
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lucius Sams were reported at $819. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Lucius Sams Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,527 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $676 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $973 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $649 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $908 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $560 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $819 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,113 67 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $820 54 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $774 52 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $378 22 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $372 28 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $364 21 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $358 21 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $356 24 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $335 24 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $206 16 payments
  11. Other $1,035 64 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,112 393 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $629 41 payments
  2. UBRELVY $463 29 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $454 29 payments
  4. Repatha $337 20 payments
  5. FARXIGA $336 20 payments
  6. PAXLOVID $317 21 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $312 20 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT $302 19 payments
  9. JARDIANCE $294 21 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $294 17 payments
  11. Other $5,965 393 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 106 drugs

Part D claims

8,325

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$589,092

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 159 $164,451
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 61 $99,955
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 84 $82,803
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 48 $39,560
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 28 $22,662
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 16 $22,250
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 31 $21,361
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 13 $15,164
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 14 $9,580
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 19 $9,191

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 106 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$254,265

Of which drugs: $11,923

Medicare patients

475

Average age 77

Services billed

7,294

241 women, 234 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 20%
Cancer 19%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 90 90 $6,318
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 19 19 $5,513

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $64
$64 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $47
$47 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $44
$44 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $44
$44 61 —
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $36
$36 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

393 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record