Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lori Travis

Neurology Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1093794885 CMS profile 276843

3805 E Bell Rd Ste 2400, Phoenix, AZ 85032

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$405,514

1,593 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,010

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,093,895 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Lori Travis of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $405,514 across 1,593 general payments and $1,010 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,093,895 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $31,204 255
2024 General $40,883 279
2023 General $18,044 245
2022 General $51,454 292
2021 General $57,758 248
2020 General $49,160 100
2020 Research $1,010 2
2019 General $157,011 174

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lori Travis
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lori Travis were reported at $31,204. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Lori Travis Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $157,011 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $49,160 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $57,758 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $51,454 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $18,044 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $40,883 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $31,204 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genzyme Corporation $95,706 132 payments
  2. EMD Serono, Inc. $83,344 137 payments
  3. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $62,016 77 payments
  4. Biogen, Inc. $59,270 206 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $22,763 202 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $18,613 73 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $12,517 11 payments
  8. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $10,889 32 payments
  9. Banner Life Sciences, LLC $9,265 111 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC $6,853 4 payments
  11. Other $24,277 608 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $211,926 95 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $135,507 43 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $31,998 1,375 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $21,059 62 payments
  5. Grant $4,000 1 payment
  6. Education $1,024 17 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ACTHAR $62,016 77 payments
  2. AUBAGIO Multiple Sclerosis $47,720 45 payments
  3. ZEPOSIA $21,565 76 payments
  4. VUMERITY $20,288 75 payments
  5. Mavenclad Neurology $17,207 33 payments
  6. AUBAGIO Neurology $14,990 38 payments
  7. MAYZENT $13,483 30 payments
  8. Mavenclad Neurology $10,602 7 payments
  9. TYSABRI $10,548 47 payments
  10. COPAXONE $10,167 5 payments
  11. Other $81,577 1,082 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genzyme Corporation $1,010 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

796

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,253,654

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

34.9%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Aubagio Teriflunomide Brand 39 $398,634
Bafiertam Monomethyl Fumarate Brand 28 $230,248
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 19 $212,179
Copaxone Glatiramer Acetate Brand 26 $146,521
Ampyra Dalfampridine Brand 14 $73,281
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 23 $51,353
Teriflunomide Generic 36 $38,777
Glatopa Glatiramer Acetate Brand 14 $22,766
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 28 $19,697
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 16 $17,056

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
$21,727 — —
Mavenclad
$1,800 — —
KESIMPTA
$808 19 —
BRIUMVI
$499 — —
VUMERITY
$471 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

1,595 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record