Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lori Austin-McDonald

Physician Assistant Jacksonville Beach, FL Physician Assistant

NPI 1699959205 CMS profile 11197698

900 Beach Blvd, Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,816

557 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lori Austin-McDonald of Jacksonville Beach, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,816 across 557 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,171 67
2024 General $1,263 67
2023 General $2,396 125
2022 General $1,581 118
2021 General $2,404 180

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lori Austin-McDonald
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lori Austin-McDonald were reported at $1,171. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Lori Austin-McDonald Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,404 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $1,581 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $2,396 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $1,263 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $1,171 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,487 82 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,221 77 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,129 92 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,052 104 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $488 12 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $470 36 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $413 19 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $389 16 payments
  9. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $251 16 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $224 13 payments
  11. Other $1,691 90 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,756 552 payments
  2. Education $42 4 payments
  3. Gift $18 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Repatha Cardiology $1,026 55 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $864 58 payments
  3. Otezla $735 59 payments
  4. VRAYLAR $609 40 payments
  5. Ozempic $528 50 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $523 49 payments
  7. BREZTRI $338 9 payments
  8. REPATHA Cardiovascular $308 15 payments
  9. NURTEC ODT $304 24 payments
  10. AREXVY $280 14 payments
  11. Other $6,501 426 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 121 drugs

Part D claims

6,690

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$417,628

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

17.2%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 59 $68,975
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 46 $61,262
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 83 $53,291
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 38 $49,057
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 17 $33,053
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 40 $21,971
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 12 $18,776
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 18 $11,006
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 12 $9,774
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 80 $6,894

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 121 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$77,718

Of which drugs: $6,877

Medicare patients

440

Average age 75

Services billed

3,818

313 women, 127 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 22%
COPD 21%
Osteoporosis 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 11 12 $3,459
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 34 34 $2,670
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 24 2,040 $208
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 29 68 $50
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 12 17 $14

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Repatha
  • Amgen Inc. $153
$153 12 —
FASENRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $121
$121 — —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $80
$80 — —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $76
$76 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $32
  • Lilly USA, LLC $16
$48 46 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

557 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record