Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lisa Ostrowski

Physician Assistant Arlington, TX Physician Assistant

NPI 1881853786 CMS profile 10621321

723 N Fielder Rd, Ste C, Arlington, TX 76012

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$47,006

1,235 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lisa Ostrowski of Arlington, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $47,006 across 1,235 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,437 298
2024 General $6,337 333
2023 General $29,697 335
2022 General $2,971 187
2021 General $2,564 82

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lisa Ostrowski
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lisa Ostrowski were reported at $5,437. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Lisa Ostrowski Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $2,564 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,971 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $29,697 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $6,337 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $5,437 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Biofrontera Inc. $23,078 42 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $3,226 163 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $2,881 59 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,056 148 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,835 60 payments
  6. Dermavant Sciences, Inc. $1,799 104 payments
  7. Incyte Corporation $1,549 33 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $1,458 67 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $1,056 57 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,040 50 payments
  11. Other $7,028 452 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Royalty or License $22,500 4 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $19,364 1,214 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $2,325 2 payments
  4. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,300 2 payments
  5. Honoraria $1,053 2 payments
  6. Education $433 10 payments
  7. Travel and Lodging $30 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. BF-RhodoLED $23,019 39 payments
  2. XEPI $23,019 39 payments
  3. AMELUZ $22,965 34 payments
  4. Bimzelx $2,641 45 payments
  5. DUPIXENT $2,335 101 payments
  6. VTAMA $1,905 114 payments
  7. TREMFYA $1,691 114 payments
  8. OPZELURA $1,549 33 payments
  9. SKYRIZI $1,486 64 payments
  10. RINVOQ $1,372 80 payments
  11. Other $14,163 824 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

1,157

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$821,370

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

20.8%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 76 $301,293
Otezla Apremilast Brand 24 $123,771
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 16 $106,191
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 14 $102,230
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 13 $78,710
Adbry Tralokinumab-Ldrm Brand 14 $53,978
Vtama Tapinarof Brand 17 $22,868
Zoryve Roflumilast Brand 13 $10,724
Imiquimod Generic 169 $5,555
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 104 $4,709

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 66 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$199,962

Of which drugs: $43,415

Medicare patients

417

Average age 74

Services billed

35,938

240 women, 177 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 69%
Arthritis 45%
Diabetes 25%
Ischemic heart disease 20%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Depression 18%
Cancer 17%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 83 32,600 $43,384
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 17 40 $29

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 33 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OPZELURA
$1,130 — —
DUPIXENT
$588 76 —
TREMFYA
$566 — —
Bimzelx
$456 — —
VTAMA
$394 17 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 33 with Patron

Records

1,235 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record