Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lisa Cibik

Ophthalmology West Mifflin, PA Medical Doctor

NPI 1477559854 CMS profile 157626

9970 Mountain View Dr, Suite 200, West Mifflin, PA 15122

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,475

322 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$28,160

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$11,604 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Lisa Cibik of West Mifflin, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,475 across 322 general payments and $28,160 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $11,604 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,137 53
2024 General $1,315 53
2023 General $810 40
2023 Research $28,160 1
2022 General $8,068 69
2021 General $5,466 54
2020 General $410 23
2019 General $4,270 30

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lisa Cibik
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lisa Cibik were reported at $1,137. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Lisa Cibik Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,270 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $410 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $5,466 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $8,068 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $810 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $1,315 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $1,137 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $9,750 66 payments
  2. Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. $6,720 1 payment
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,225 56 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,000 67 payments
  5. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $683 41 payments
  6. New World Medical,Inc. $250 10 payments
  7. Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $215 10 payments
  8. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $214 8 payments
  9. Glaukos Corporation $196 4 payments
  10. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $141 7 payments
  11. Other $1,081 52 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $11,375 4 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $6,915 317 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $3,185 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AcrySof IQ PanOptix $3,424 3 payments
  2. ORA Ophthalmology $2,098 9 payments
  3. PANOPTIX $1,488 2 payments
  4. ORA Ophthalmology $1,225 1 payment
  5. XIIDRA $1,193 79 payments
  6. Cequa $1,173 52 payments
  7. MIEBO $590 36 payments
  8. BromSite $463 29 payments
  9. Xelpros $404 18 payments
  10. VYZULTA $345 21 payments
  11. Other $4,526 187 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. $28,160 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 45 drugs

Part D claims

6,282

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$1,581,870

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

41.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 390 $480,370
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 248 $246,307
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 414 $184,451
Cyclosporine Generic 293 $177,491
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 103 $50,670
Prolensa Bromfenac Sodium Brand 124 $43,483
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 219 $42,291
Cequa Cyclosporine Brand 35 $30,807
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 131 $30,763
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 35 $28,384

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 45 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$260,430

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

424

Average age 73

Services billed

2,461

251 women, 173 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Depression 20%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Osteoporosis 15%
COPD 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $149
$149 35 —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $147
$147 35 —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $143
$143 — —
XIIDRA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $107
$107 390 —
DEXTENZA
  • Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $103
$103 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

323 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record