Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lindsay Stevens

Nurse Practitioner Fort Wayne, IN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1083277362 CMS profile 10847937

4020 New Vision Dr, Fort Wayne, IN 46845

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,098

486 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lindsay Stevens of Fort Wayne, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,098 across 486 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,582 108
2024 General $2,001 113
2023 General $1,505 101
2022 General $1,412 124
2021 General $598 40

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lindsay Stevens
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lindsay Stevens were reported at $1,582. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Lindsay Stevens Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $598 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,412 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,505 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $2,001 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,582 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,674 128 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,051 88 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,005 54 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $826 63 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $433 25 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $420 44 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $354 21 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $306 13 payments
  9. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $184 10 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $153 7 payments
  11. Other $691 33 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,613 477 payments
  2. Education $485 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,571 117 payments
  2. Bimzelx $758 40 payments
  3. DUPIXENT $491 19 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $452 38 payments
  5. RINVOQ $379 27 payments
  6. CIBINQO $361 40 payments
  7. TALTZ $341 20 payments
  8. Winlevi $316 23 payments
  9. COSENTYX $239 28 payments
  10. Cimzia $238 13 payments
  11. Other $2,388 170 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

1,538

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$765,289

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

8.3%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 16 $215,039
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 39 $146,782
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 22 $131,247
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 18 $129,325
Otezla Apremilast Brand 15 $101,594
Fluorouracil Generic 144 $11,837
Tacrolimus Generic 55 $7,077
Ketoconazole Generic 330 $5,028
Fluocinonide Generic 106 $3,610
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 78 $2,875

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$116,792

Of which drugs: $8,237

Medicare patients

696

Average age 75

Services billed

3,999

384 women, 312 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
COPD 15%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 24 28 $8,226

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $414
$414 16 —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $210
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $99
$309 39 —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $300
$300 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $133
$133 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $120
$120 18 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

486 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record