Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Liberty MacIas

Nurse Practitioner, Psychiatric/Mental Health Redlands, CA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1376936476 CMS profile 10680353

515 New Jersey St Ste A, Redlands, CA 92373

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$288,210

1,196 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Liberty MacIas of Redlands, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $288,210 across 1,196 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Psychiatric/Mental Health profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $136,441 376
2024 General $39,440 264
2023 General $52,537 251
2022 General $52,460 151
2021 General $7,333 154

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Liberty MacIas
  • Nurse Practitioner, Psychiatric/Mental Health median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Psychiatric/Mental Health
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Liberty MacIas were reported at $136,441. Among 26,152 Nurse Practitioner, Psychiatric/Mental Health profiles paid that year, the median was $258 and the middle half received between $93 and $764.

Show as a table
Year Liberty MacIas Nurse Practitioner, Psychiatric/Mental Health median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $7,333 $166 $54–$482 $132
2022 $52,460 $195 $66–$559 $149
2023 $52,537 $233 $82–$673 $160
2024 $39,440 $236 $84–$688 $164
2025 $136,441 $258 $93–$764 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Alkermes, Inc. $74,169 177 payments
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $73,559 211 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $34,619 65 payments
  4. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $27,919 49 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $26,719 158 payments
  6. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $21,136 63 payments
  7. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc $8,944 35 payments
  8. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. $7,275 21 payments
  9. ITI, Inc. $5,837 42 payments
  10. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $2,853 126 payments
  11. Other $5,180 249 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $201,825 129 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $29,818 932 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $26,597 109 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $17,114 13 payments
  5. Honoraria $11,540 7 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $975 1 payment
  7. Education $342 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. LYBALVI Cns $73,026 130 payments
  2. LYBALVI Cns $72,868 123 payments
  3. LYBALVI Cns $72,868 123 payments
  4. LYBALVI Cns $72,868 123 payments
  5. UZEDY $41,777 108 payments
  6. COBENFY $30,498 53 payments
  7. INGREZZA $26,668 43 payments
  8. VRAYLAR $24,250 101 payments
  9. Auvelity $21,136 63 payments
  10. Austedo XR $16,824 52 payments
  11. Other $54,470 883 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 48 drugs

Part D claims

1,713

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$786,739

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

31.8%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Austedo Xr Deutetrabenazine Brand 34 $208,792
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 24 $180,064
Lybalvi Olanzapine/Samidorphan Malate Brand 54 $91,571
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 32 $64,030
Auvelity Dextromethorphan Hbr/Bupropion Brand 47 $48,720
Caplyta Lumateperone Tosylate Brand 27 $43,827
Invega Sustenna Paliperidone Palmitate Brand 12 $40,265
Quviviq Daridorexant Hcl Brand 47 $22,648
Vraylar Cariprazine Hcl Brand 16 $22,226
Trintellix Vortioxetine Hydrobromide Brand 40 $22,201

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 48 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 4 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$13,302

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

45

Average age 61

Services billed

224

24 women, 21 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Depression 56%
Arthritis 44%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UZEDY
$11,788 — —
LYBALVI
$7,291 54 —
Austedo XR
$5,952 34 —
Auvelity
$5,022 47 —
VRAYLAR
$2,024 16 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

1,196 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Psychiatric/Mental Health in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record