Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leslie Storey

MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Fresno, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1043313133 CMS profile 183024

7777 N. Ingram Ave., Fresno, CA 93711

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$10,637

639 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Leslie Storey of Fresno, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $10,637 across 639 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 88th percentile of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,470 101
2024 General $2,536 168
2023 General $2,106 121
2022 General $2,154 127
2021 General $657 49
2020 General $527 29
2019 General $1,187 44

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leslie Storey
  • MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median
  • Middle half of MOHS-Micrographic Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leslie Storey were reported at $1,470. Among 1,077 MOHS-Micrographic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $465 and the middle half received between $145 and $1,066.

Show as a table
Year Leslie Storey MOHS-Micrographic Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $1,187 $316 $106–$785 $163
2020 $527 $162 $68–$412 $114
2021 $657 $243 $87–$654 $132
2022 $2,154 $300 $102–$887 $149
2023 $2,106 $364 $125–$1,010 $160
2024 $2,536 $445 $142–$1,108 $164
2025 $1,470 $465 $145–$1,066 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,355 150 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $940 53 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $785 48 payments
  4. LEO Pharma Inc. $755 39 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $755 62 payments
  6. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $613 27 payments
  7. Incyte Corporation $535 44 payments
  8. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $485 38 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $460 21 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $409 21 payments
  11. Other $2,545 136 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,135 633 payments
  2. Education $503 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $1,140 65 payments
  2. TREMFYA $915 52 payments
  3. RINVOQ $893 59 payments
  4. ADBRY $702 37 payments
  5. TALTZ $626 56 payments
  6. HUMIRA $520 39 payments
  7. OPZELURA $515 43 payments
  8. COSENTYX $500 30 payments
  9. DUPIXENT $480 22 payments
  10. SOTYKTU $362 21 payments
  11. Other $5,490 303 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 38 drugs

Part D claims

2,369

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,229,059

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

13.8%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 25 $332,225
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 79 $293,666
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 12 $176,459
Otezla Apremilast Brand 16 $111,215
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 16 $111,082
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 13 $47,776
Adbry Tralokinumab-Ldrm Brand 11 $40,914
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 11 $40,442
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 14 $27,014
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 455 $6,496

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 38 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 157 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,562,467

Of which drugs: $64,558

Medicare patients

4,712

Average age 75

Services billed

41,919

2,898 women, 1,814 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Diabetes 23%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Osteoporosis 21%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 94 117 $35,069
Puraply am, per square centimeter Q4196 Office 63 253 $20,447
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 15 3,002 $3,843
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 32 95 $352
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 200 490 $344
Injection, fluorouracil, 500 mg J9190 Office 53 68 $145

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$264 90 —
TREMFYA
$251 25 —
RINVOQ
$246 — —
SOTYKTU
$181 — —
VTAMA
$167 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

639 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record