Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leslie Bennett

Hematology & Oncology Flushing, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1487610556 CMS profile 519494

135-40 78Th Dr, Flushing, NY 11367

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$80

4 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Leslie Bennett of Flushing, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $80 across 4 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 9th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $17 1
2024 General $20 1
2022 General $43 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leslie Bennett
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leslie Bennett were reported at $17. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Leslie Bennett Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $0 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $0 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $43 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $0 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $20 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $17 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $24 1 payment
  2. Exact Sciences Corporation $20 1 payment
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $19 1 payment
  4. Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $17 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $80 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $24 1 payment
  2. Ozempic $24 1 payment
  3. Cologuard Collection Kit $20 1 payment
  4. FARXIGA $19 1 payment
  5. PYRUKYND $17 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 86 drugs

Part D claims

2,941

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$298,983

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Penicillamine Generic 23 $63,705
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 51 $50,432
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 31 $43,480
Dihydroergotamine Mesylate Generic 22 $23,777
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 19 $20,052
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 21 $16,939
Namzaric Memantine Hcl/Donepezil Hcl Brand 23 $12,444
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 15 $9,899
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 12 $7,294
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 11 $6,090

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 86 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$90,857

Of which drugs: $2,672

Medicare patients

165

Average age 74

Services billed

1,879

81 women, 84 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Diabetes 41%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Cancer 33%
Depression 18%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 30 30 $2,455
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 17 79 $78

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

4 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record