Medical Doctor Program year 2021 Reported 2019–2021 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leopold Laufer

Dermatology Portland, ME Medical Doctor

NPI 1336194547 CMS profile 332514

1601 Congress St, Suite #205, Portland, ME 04102

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,013

148 records reported · program years 2019–2021

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2021

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2021, Leopold Laufer of Portland, ME is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,013 across 148 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 46th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2021 General $17 1
2020 General $298 16
2019 General $1,698 131

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leopold Laufer
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leopold Laufer were reported at $0. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Leopold Laufer Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,698 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $298 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $17 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $0 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $0 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $0 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $0 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Mayne Pharma Inc. $338 27 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $325 15 payments
  3. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $185 14 payments
  4. Celgene Corporation $179 13 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $166 19 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $142 8 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $140 17 payments
  8. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $86 5 payments
  9. PruGen, Inc. Pharmaceuticals $73 6 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $71 4 payments
  11. Other $308 20 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Food and Beverage $1,915 147 payments
  2. Education $98 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. DUPIXENT $325 15 payments
  2. DORYX $258 23 payments
  3. EUCRISA $166 19 payments
  4. Otezla $157 12 payments
  5. Erivedge $140 17 payments
  6. TALTZ $131 7 payments
  7. BRYHALI $111 9 payments
  8. LEXETTE $80 4 payments
  9. Ultravate $61 4 payments
  10. Seysara $58 3 payments
  11. Other $601 41 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

1,311

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$267,300

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

17.5%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 35 $124,528
Otezla Apremilast Brand 22 $87,874
Tacrolimus Generic 78 $9,410
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 160 $7,708
Clobetasol Emollient Clobetasol Propionate/Emoll Brand 98 $7,181
Imiquimod Generic 31 $5,945
Halobetasol Propionate Generic 128 $5,825
Fluorouracil Generic 69 $5,049
Ketoconazole Generic 167 $2,637
Pimecrolimus Generic 16 $2,572

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$13,339

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

139

Average age 76

Services billed

549

65 women, 74 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 64%
Arthritis 40%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 17%
Diabetes 16%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Cancer 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

148 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record