Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leon Tung

Critical Care Medicine Tyler, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1700171287 CMS profile 1273860

619 S Fleishel Ave Ste 100, Tyler, TX 75701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,953

81 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$38,070 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2022

Through program year 2025, Leon Tung of Tyler, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,953 across 81 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $38,070 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 85th percentile of Critical Care Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $99 1
2024 General $180 10
2023 General $1,888 34
2022 General $2,353 30
2021 General $333 4
2020 General $52 1
2019 General $48 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leon Tung
  • Critical Care Medicine median
  • Middle half of Critical Care Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leon Tung were reported at $99. Among 2,664 Critical Care Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $189 and the middle half received between $59 and $844.

Show as a table
Year Leon Tung Critical Care Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $48 $149 $51–$535 $163
2020 $52 $110 $30–$325 $114
2021 $333 $125 $34–$403 $132
2022 $2,353 $157 $49–$582 $149
2023 $1,888 $162 $56–$621 $160
2024 $180 $168 $53–$634 $164
2025 $99 $189 $59–$844 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ethicon Inc. $1,854 6 payments
  2. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $932 4 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $778 16 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $399 21 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $199 9 payments
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $116 1 payment
  7. Harmony Biosciences LLC $100 1 payment
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $99 1 payment
  9. Genzyme Corporation $85 3 payments
  10. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $52 1 payment
  11. Other $339 18 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Travel and Lodging $2,743 8 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $2,068 70 payments
  3. Education $142 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Monarch Platform $1,854 6 payments
  2. Da Vinci Surgical System $932 4 payments
  3. FASENRA $354 6 payments
  4. TEZSPIRE $311 4 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $266 17 payments
  6. BREZTRI $192 7 payments
  7. DUPIXENT $184 4 payments
  8. NUCALA $133 4 payments
  9. OFEV $127 6 payments
  10. AIRSUPRA $118 2 payments
  11. Other $867 29 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

814

Median for Critical Care (Intensivists): 406

Drug cost

$436,893

Median for Critical Care (Intensivists): $197,260

Branded share of claims

69%

Median for Critical Care (Intensivists): 69%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ofev Nintedanib Esylate Brand 12 $156,747
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 171 $121,221
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 60 $64,360
Tezspire Tezepelumab-Ekko Brand 16 $62,317
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 26 $7,801
Albuterol Sulfate Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 173 $5,387
Advair Hfa Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol Brand 11 $4,646
Breyna Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 14 $4,025
Dulera Mometasone/Formoterol Brand 12 $3,763
Ventolin Hfa Albuterol Sulfate Brand 33 $1,872

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,531 Part D prescribers listed as Critical Care (Intensivists); they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$144,056

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

593

Average age 74

Services billed

1,760

297 women, 296 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 58%
COPD 58%
Arthritis 58%
Heart failure 51%
Diabetes 45%
Atrial fibrillation 41%
Chronic kidney disease 41%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $46
$46 60 —
OPSUMIT
  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $33
$33 — —
Prolastin-C Liquid
  • Grifols USA, LLC $24
$24 — —
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $23
$23 12 —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $17
$17 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

81 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record