Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leo Blaize

Internal Medicine Baton Rouge, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1578563177 CMS profile 252483

7777 Hennessy Blvd, Suite 7000, Baton Rouge, LA 70808

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,862

1,070 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Leo Blaize of Baton Rouge, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,862 across 1,070 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,696 90
2024 General $2,059 121
2023 General $2,851 181
2022 General $2,800 171
2021 General $2,170 130
2020 General $2,026 132
2019 General $3,261 245

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leo Blaize
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leo Blaize were reported at $1,696. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Leo Blaize Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,261 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,026 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,170 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,800 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,851 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,059 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,696 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,071 139 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,496 101 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,311 94 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,130 67 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $1,047 51 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,022 44 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $991 70 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $977 73 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $599 41 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $572 34 payments
  11. Other $5,647 356 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,782 1,060 payments
  2. Education $81 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $939 70 payments
  2. JARDIANCE $909 62 payments
  3. SPIRIVA RESPIMAT $871 59 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $816 49 payments
  5. Repatha $751 32 payments
  6. RYBELSUS $723 51 payments
  7. FARXIGA $635 23 payments
  8. GLYXAMBI $619 45 payments
  9. UBRELVY $579 40 payments
  10. XARELTO $569 56 payments
  11. Other $17,297 1,119 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 165 drugs

Part D claims

12,345

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,637,278

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

26.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 245 $253,702
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 183 $235,787
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 131 $152,648
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 178 $151,618
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 88 $81,813
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 105 $79,698
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 52 $71,966
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 94 $60,736
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 56 $51,907
Belsomra Suvorexant Brand 96 $45,384

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 165 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$79,181

Of which drugs: $9,855

Medicare patients

320

Average age 77

Services billed

1,461

147 women, 173 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Diabetes 25%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Depression 19%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Cancer 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 79 80 $6,506
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 11 11 $3,176

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$354 245 —
GEMTESA
$197 11 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$120 43 —
Kerendia
$98 — —
MOUNJARO
$90 183 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

1,070 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record