Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leigh Perreault

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Boulder, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1669562344 CMS profile 809193

5495 Arapahoe Ave, Boulder, CO 80303

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,657,614

1,583 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Leigh Perreault of Boulder, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,657,614 across 1,583 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $219,647 195
2024 General $225,827 256
2023 General $184,082 219
2022 General $264,930 249
2021 General $237,279 189
2020 General $205,763 191
2019 General $320,085 284

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leigh Perreault
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leigh Perreault were reported at $219,647. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Leigh Perreault Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $320,085 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $205,763 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $237,279 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $264,930 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $184,082 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $225,827 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $219,647 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $495,927 571 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $483,498 380 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $260,492 292 payments
  4. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $122,125 49 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $75,311 86 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $51,585 58 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $45,268 38 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $42,730 36 payments
  9. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $33,971 26 payments
  10. Eli Lilly and Company $31,483 33 payments
  11. Other $15,223 14 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,174,061 599 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $276,757 79 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $177,006 496 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $29,784 408 payments
  5. Education $5 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. JARDIANCE Diabetes $207,365 193 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $162,433 175 payments
  3. Wegovy $121,301 98 payments
  4. Saxenda $93,573 82 payments
  5. ZEPBOUND $88,298 99 payments
  6. MOUNJARO $82,743 118 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $81,629 60 payments
  8. Ozempic $78,619 61 payments
  9. FARXIGA $75,279 85 payments
  10. LYUMJEV $62,056 61 payments
  11. Other $320,092 247 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

625

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$568,518

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

65.8%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 105 $147,950
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 67 $144,952
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 89 $134,502
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 44 $62,334
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 19 $33,462
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 11 $30,784
Novolog Insulin Aspart Brand 18 $4,315
Lantus Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 23 $3,955
Nano 2nd Gen Pen Needle Pen Needle, Diabetic Brand 24 $3,404
Synthroid Levothyroxine Sodium Brand 11 $757

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 6 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$7,745

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

52

Average age 72

Services billed

116

31 women, 21 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 65%
Chronic kidney disease 48%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Depression 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$88,340 105 —
ZEPBOUND
$45,299 — —
Wegovy
$41,349 — —
XARELTO
$4,371 — —
Ozempic
$4,221 67 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,583 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record