Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lee Wesler

Internal Medicine Dayville, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1982766325 CMS profile 226342

612 Hartford Pike, Dayville, CT 06241

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$22,580

942 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lee Wesler of Dayville, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $22,580 across 942 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,444 148
2024 General $3,513 146
2023 General $3,612 153
2022 General $3,161 147
2021 General $3,202 120
2020 General $1,644 93
2019 General $3,004 135

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lee Wesler
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lee Wesler were reported at $4,444. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Lee Wesler Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,004 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,644 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $3,202 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,161 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,612 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,513 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $4,444 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,313 130 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,872 66 payments
  3. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,797 62 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,761 125 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $1,701 73 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,422 74 payments
  7. Corcept Therapeutics $1,312 40 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $785 33 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $732 35 payments
  10. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $725 18 payments
  11. Other $8,160 286 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,557 880 payments
  2. Education $1,019 61 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $4 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,335 110 payments
  2. Korlym $1,312 40 payments
  3. JARDIANCE $1,294 90 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $1,071 96 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $925 52 payments
  6. Austedo XR $777 33 payments
  7. FARXIGA $747 22 payments
  8. UBRELVY $710 19 payments
  9. ELIQUIS $604 28 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $601 38 payments
  11. Other $16,787 651 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 193 drugs

Part D claims

15,910

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$5,553,160

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

38.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Korlym Mifepristone Brand 69 $986,861
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 688 $874,586
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 512 $643,416
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 353 $438,492
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 379 $368,435
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 207 $241,202
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 166 $193,830
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 226 $173,378
Austedo Deutetrabenazine Brand 14 $151,285
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 150 $143,989

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 193 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$94,148

Of which drugs: $4,287

Medicare patients

255

Average age 75

Services billed

1,561

102 women, 153 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 40%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
COPD 27%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Depression 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 25 25 $2,046

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 47 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Korlym
$486 69 —
Austedo XR
$209 27 —
Repatha
$131 239 —
VRAYLAR
$123 28 —
ELIQUIS
$121 379 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 47 with Patron

Records

942 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record