Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lee Silk

Interventional Pain Medicine Waltham, MA Medical Doctor

NPI 1487693479 CMS profile 113104

85 1St Ave, Waltham, MA 02451

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,942

104 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lee Silk of Waltham, MA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,942 across 104 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 35th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $242 17
2024 General $426 19
2023 General $392 22
2022 General $388 22
2021 General $195 7
2019 General $300 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lee Silk
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lee Silk were reported at $242. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Lee Silk Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $300 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $0 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $195 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $388 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $392 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $426 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $242 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $985 54 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $221 15 payments
  3. Lundbeck LLC $158 7 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $142 4 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $59 3 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $56 3 payments
  7. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $53 3 payments
  8. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $40 2 payments
  9. Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. $36 2 payments
  10. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC $33 2 payments
  11. Other $158 9 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $1,942 104 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $933 51 payments
  2. QULIPTA $277 20 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT Pain $198 12 payments
  4. VYEPTI $158 7 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $142 4 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $59 3 payments
  7. EMGALITY $56 3 payments
  8. Symbravo $40 2 payments
  9. ZTLido 30 POUCH in 1 CARTON 1 PATCH in 1 POUCH $36 2 payments
  10. ZAVZPRET $36 4 payments
  11. Other $313 19 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

786

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$161,011

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

37%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 67 $75,866
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 21 $33,728
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 39 $28,296
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 14 $10,725
Gabapentin Generic 42 $3,651
Butalbital-Acetaminophen-Caffe Butalb/Acetaminophen/Caffeine Brand 53 $1,522
Topiramate Generic 14 $1,194
Sumatriptan Succinate Generic 40 $911
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 78 $781
Amitriptyline Hcl Generic 34 $749

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 24 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$151,533

Of which drugs: $8,177

Medicare patients

139

Average age 68

Services billed

4,956

106 women, 33 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 67%
High blood pressure 55%
Depression 44%
Osteoporosis 25%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
COPD 16%
Cancer 15%
Diabetes 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 26 1,453 $151
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 18 22 $91

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $196
$196 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $117
$117 21 —
VYEPTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $52
$52 — —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $44
$44 67 —
ZAVZPRET
  • PFIZER INC. $16
$16 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

104 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Massachusetts

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record