Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leda Duck

Pediatrics Winchester, VA Medical Doctor

NPI 1568491223 CMS profile 161954

190 Campus Blvd, Ste 400, Winchester, VA 22601

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,504

111 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Leda Duck of Winchester, VA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,504 across 111 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $401 21
2024 General $640 18
2023 General $231 13
2022 General $424 23
2021 General $236 13
2020 General $72 4
2019 General $499 19

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leda Duck
  • Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leda Duck were reported at $401. Among 22,296 Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $97 and the middle half received between $37 and $210.

Show as a table
Year Leda Duck Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $499 $86 $31–$183 $163
2020 $72 $49 $22–$110 $114
2021 $236 $68 $27–$158 $132
2022 $424 $77 $30–$173 $149
2023 $231 $88 $33–$190 $160
2024 $640 $94 $34–$206 $164
2025 $401 $97 $37–$210 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $549 12 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $333 15 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $246 13 payments
  4. Corium, Inc. $235 13 payments
  5. Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc. $217 6 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $171 10 payments
  7. Cranial Technologies, Inc $123 8 payments
  8. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $120 6 payments
  9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $91 5 payments
  10. kaleo, Inc. $86 5 payments
  11. Other $333 18 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,504 111 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Qelbree Viloxazine Hydrochloride $434 7 payments
  2. BEXSERO $316 14 payments
  3. TRUMENBA $246 13 payments
  4. Azstarys $235 13 payments
  5. Jornay PM 20mg capsules (Bottle of 100) $168 3 payments
  6. GARDASIL 9 $135 7 payments
  7. Doc Band $123 8 payments
  8. PREVNAR 13 $116 7 payments
  9. QELBREE Psychology $115 5 payments
  10. VAXELIS $109 6 payments
  11. Other $1,471 81 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

111 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pediatrics in Virginia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record