Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2021 Reported 2020–2021 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Leah Schammel

Dermatology Willmar, MN Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1467644450 CMS profile 1307164

101 Willmar Ave Sw, Willmar, MN 56201

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$150

10 records reported · program years 2020–2021

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2021

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2021, Leah Schammel of Willmar, MN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $150 across 10 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 12th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2021 General $45 3
2020 General $105 7

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Leah Schammel
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Leah Schammel were reported at $0. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Leah Schammel Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $105 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $45 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $0 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $0 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $0 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $0 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. Amgen Inc. $150 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. Education $150 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. Otezla $150 10 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 39 drugs

Part D claims

1,752

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$781,936

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

11.6%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 39 $278,516
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 24 $200,972
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 37 $145,475
Otezla Apremilast Brand 19 $106,232
Fluorouracil Generic 78 $5,728
Doxycycline Monohydrate Generic 106 $4,921
Metronidazole Generic 75 $3,810
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 101 $3,521
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 269 $3,387
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 54 $3,357

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 39 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$268,891

Of which drugs: $14,868

Medicare patients

1,145

Average age 75

Services billed

5,529

642 women, 503 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 37%
Diabetes 24%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Cancer 18%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 13 27 $8,366
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 34 291 $183

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

10 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Minnesota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record