Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lawrence Zimnoch

Internal Medicine Washington, DC Medical Doctor

NPI 1881611556 CMS profile 929356

2311 M St Nw Ste 302, Washington, DC 20037

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,886

1,132 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lawrence Zimnoch of Washington, DC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,886 across 1,132 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,736 160
2024 General $3,788 172
2023 General $2,252 117
2022 General $1,850 116
2021 General $2,969 163
2020 General $3,112 167
2019 General $4,178 237

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lawrence Zimnoch
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lawrence Zimnoch were reported at $3,736. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Lawrence Zimnoch Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $4,178 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,112 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,969 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,850 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,252 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,788 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,736 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $4,426 211 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $3,434 152 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,786 97 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,168 59 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,026 69 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $955 53 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $923 71 payments
  8. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $706 36 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $689 34 payments
  10. Theratechnologies Inc. $660 25 payments
  11. Other $6,114 325 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $21,716 1,127 payments
  2. Education $158 4 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $12 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DOVATO $1,557 78 payments
  2. XIFAXAN $914 70 payments
  3. UBRELVY $878 45 payments
  4. CABENUVA $732 30 payments
  5. FARXIGA $711 34 payments
  6. REXULTI $706 36 payments
  7. SYMTUZA $679 32 payments
  8. TROGARZO $660 25 payments
  9. Ozempic $589 35 payments
  10. EGRIFTA $556 20 payments
  11. Other $14,812 814 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 60 drugs

Part D claims

1,622

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$317,186

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 21 $90,749
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 19 $77,559
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 12 $49,059
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 21 $21,503
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 12 $11,309
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 17 $10,736
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 13 $7,939
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 13 $7,796
Doxycycline Ir-Dr Doxycycline Monohydrate Brand 11 $4,463
Nexlizet Bempedoic Acid/Ezetimibe Brand 11 $4,372

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 60 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 33 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$65,627

Of which drugs: $7,106

Medicare patients

219

Average age 74

Services billed

1,248

85 women, 134 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 51%
Arthritis 39%
Diabetes 15%
Depression 14%
Ischemic heart disease 13%
Cancer 12%
Atrial fibrillation 9%
Chronic kidney disease 9%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 16 16 $4,637
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 29 30 $2,445

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
APRETUDE
$325 — —
CABENUVA
$325 — —
TRINTELLIX
$170 — —
REXULTI
$160 — —
DOVATO
$125 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,132 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in District of Columbia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record