Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lawrence Green

Neurology Nampa, ID Medical Doctor

NPI 1386692333 CMS profile 431344

16060 Idaho Center Blvd, Nampa, ID 83687

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$192,696

737 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lawrence Green of Nampa, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $192,696 across 737 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $835 39
2024 General $9,867 56
2023 General $10,263 88
2022 General $58,092 127
2021 General $37,751 129
2020 General $22,811 124
2019 General $53,077 174

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lawrence Green
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lawrence Green were reported at $835. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Lawrence Green Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $53,077 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $22,811 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $37,751 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $58,092 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $10,263 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $9,867 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $835 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $45,384 50 payments
  2. Biogen, Inc. $38,376 104 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $24,553 75 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $24,307 37 payments
  5. Lundbeck LLC $22,789 63 payments
  6. Celgene Corporation $16,767 78 payments
  7. EMD Serono, Inc. $8,908 68 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $6,597 30 payments
  9. US Oncology Corporate, Inc. $1,337 4 payments
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $565 38 payments
  11. Other $3,114 190 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $120,176 65 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $25,057 26 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $18,858 62 payments
  4. Honoraria $16,063 12 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $12,318 568 payments
  6. Education $224 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ZEPOSIA $51,900 115 payments
  2. OCREVUS $24,552 75 payments
  3. TYSABRI $24,295 48 payments
  4. Ajovy Central Nervous System $17,574 23 payments
  5. VYEPTI Neurology $14,571 25 payments
  6. VYEPTI Neurology $8,218 38 payments
  7. Mavenclad $7,846 13 payments
  8. AUBAGIO $6,523 23 payments
  9. AJOVY Central Nervous System $6,496 10 payments
  10. TECFIDERA $6,443 21 payments
  11. Other $10,070 346 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 76 drugs

Part D claims

2,838

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,028,839

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

25.9%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Aubagio Teriflunomide Brand 14 $129,247
Rebif Rebidose Interferon Beta-1a/Albumin Brand 12 $121,332
Avonex Pen (4 Pack) Interferon Beta-1a Brand 14 $110,658
Vumerity Diroximel Fumarate Brand 12 $105,624
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 11 $88,814
Keppra Levetiracetam Brand 44 $64,350
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 12 $44,263
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 42 $38,921
Lamictal Lamotrigine Brand 26 $36,173
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 29 $35,365

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 76 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$914,210

Of which drugs: $895,172

Medicare patients

143

Average age 71

Services billed

20,074

88 women, 55 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 64%
Arthritis 53%
Depression 32%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Diabetes 20%
Osteoporosis 20%
Alzheimer's or dementia 15%
Ischemic heart disease 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ocrelizumab, 1 mg J2350 Office 15 15,600 $704,352
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 14 700 $160

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPOSIA
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $3,673
  • Celgene Corporation $1,325
$4,998 — —
VYEPTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $4,274
$4,274 — —
BRIUMVI
  • TG Therapeutics, Inc. $140
$140 — —
Leqembi
  • Eisai Inc. $103
$103 — —
VUMERITY
  • Biogen, Inc. $61
$61 12 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

737 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Idaho

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record