Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Laurence Dennis

Internal Medicine Booneville, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1760466262 CMS profile 261094

202 N 1St St, Ste A, Booneville, MS 38829

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,742

235 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Laurence Dennis of Booneville, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,742 across 235 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $487 16
2024 General $393 22
2023 General $338 22
2022 General $535 37
2021 General $763 45
2020 General $599 42
2019 General $627 51

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Laurence Dennis
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Laurence Dennis were reported at $487. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Laurence Dennis Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $627 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $599 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $763 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $535 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $338 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $393 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $487 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $632 49 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $528 37 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $289 23 payments
  4. Alpha Cognition USA, Inc. $223 3 payments
  5. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $175 14 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $174 9 payments
  7. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $158 11 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $155 11 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $139 1 payment
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $127 7 payments
  11. Other $1,144 70 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,731 234 payments
  2. Education $11 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $587 45 payments
  2. Repatha $302 23 payments
  3. Zunveyl Neurology $223 3 payments
  4. Zunveyl Neurology $223 3 payments
  5. Zunveyl Neurology $223 3 payments
  6. Otezla $188 13 payments
  7. Ozempic $155 11 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $155 11 payments
  9. AIMOVIG $153 12 payments
  10. ELIQUIS $140 11 payments
  11. Other $2,889 177 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 255 drugs

Part D claims

29,369

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,137,509

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 648 $157,818
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 104 $69,780
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 114 $63,151
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 43 $53,240
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 260 $52,016
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 168 $48,667
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 153 $32,558
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 60 $26,915
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 140 $24,489
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 34 $22,642

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 255 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$165,448

Of which drugs: $3,303

Medicare patients

443

Average age 77

Services billed

7,421

271 women, 172 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 67%
Ischemic heart disease 49%
COPD 45%
Depression 45%
Diabetes 44%
Heart failure 41%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 34 34 $2,782
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 45 364 $109
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 67 1,197 $101
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 30 199 $95

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $45
$45 104 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $34
$34 — —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $30
$30 — —
Auvelity
  • Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. $29
$29 — —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $27
$27 153 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

235 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record