Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lauren Williamson

Internal Medicine Madison, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1912430935 CMS profile 3762806

106 Highland Way Ste 200, Madison, MS 39110

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,265

232 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Lauren Williamson of Madison, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,265 across 232 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $857 42
2024 General $697 38
2023 General $639 37
2022 General $1,468 89
2021 General $605 26

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lauren Williamson
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lauren Williamson were reported at $857. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Lauren Williamson Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $0 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $605 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,468 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $639 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $697 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $857 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $656 35 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $600 35 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $411 22 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $350 26 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $342 17 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $250 14 payments
  7. Corcept Therapeutics $204 7 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $165 10 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $148 2 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $147 7 payments
  11. Other $993 57 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,265 232 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ozempic $614 32 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $614 32 payments
  3. JARDIANCE $294 15 payments
  4. QULIPTA $250 13 payments
  5. EVENITY $222 10 payments
  6. Tresiba $219 12 payments
  7. Korlym $204 7 payments
  8. UBRELVY $182 12 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $180 14 payments
  10. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $165 10 payments
  11. Other $3,670 209 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 96 drugs

Part D claims

6,996

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$655,698

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 154 $114,084
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 136 $112,140
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 92 $102,167
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 97 $74,732
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 66 $67,954
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 46 $32,149
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 13 $21,017
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 11 $12,730
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 13 $12,357
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 18 $7,896

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 96 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$165,040

Of which drugs: $45,879

Medicare patients

472

Average age 75

Services billed

3,709

323 women, 149 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Diabetes 24%
Osteoporosis 21%
Depression 18%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Atrial fibrillation 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 15 1,140 $23,758
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 48 48 $14,001
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 96 96 $7,815

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $33
  • Lundbeck LLC $31
$64 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $52
$52 — —
NEXLETOL
  • Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. $47
$47 — —
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $42
$42 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $40
$41 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

232 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record