Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Laura Russo Herrera

Internal Medicine Visalia, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1487838660 CMS profile 1117651

3632 W Packwood Ave, Visalia, CA 93277

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,129

340 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Laura Russo Herrera of Visalia, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,129 across 340 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $347 13
2024 General $1,081 58
2023 General $978 62
2022 General $837 62
2021 General $1,107 92
2020 General $545 39
2019 General $233 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Laura Russo Herrera
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Laura Russo Herrera were reported at $347. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Laura Russo Herrera Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $233 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $545 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,107 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $837 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $978 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,081 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $347 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,263 129 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $987 62 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $418 21 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $382 21 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $319 24 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $245 12 payments
  7. Mannkind Corporation $193 10 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $144 9 payments
  9. Heron Therapeutics, Inc. $122 1 payment
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $106 5 payments
  11. Other $950 46 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,037 338 payments
  2. Education $92 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,199 122 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,081 112 payments
  3. JARDIANCE Diabetes $398 24 payments
  4. TRULICITY $346 23 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $314 20 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $278 22 payments
  7. JARDIANCE Diabetes $236 12 payments
  8. Repatha $227 11 payments
  9. Otezla $227 11 payments
  10. AFREZZA $193 10 payments
  11. Other $2,929 146 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 143 drugs

Part D claims

8,617

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$886,742

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 109 $121,075
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 77 $108,205
Xultophy 100-3.6 Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide Brand 45 $69,205
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 37 $47,824
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 47 $46,242
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 38 $40,080
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 24 $39,045
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 42 $32,031
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 30 $28,832
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 32 $28,734

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 143 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$82,213

Of which drugs: $1,525

Medicare patients

241

Average age 75

Services billed

1,037

167 women, 74 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Diabetes 33%
Arthritis 33%
Osteoporosis 31%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Cancer 17%
Depression 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 30 30 $657

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $132
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $60
$193 32 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $71
$71 109 —
AFREZZA
  • Mannkind Corporation $59
$59 — —
XYOSTED
  • Antares Pharma, Inc. $55
$55 — —
SYNTHROID
  • AbbVie, Inc. $54
$54 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

340 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record