Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Laura Periman

Ophthalmology Seattle, WA Medical Doctor

NPI 1376755009 CMS profile 335201

100 West Harrison Street, North Tower, Suite 360, Seattle, WA 98119

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,667,433

1,633 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$22,742

Paid to them · 5 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$1,832

6 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Research they led as principal investigator

$276,843 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2023

Through program year 2025, Laura Periman of Seattle, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,667,433 across 1,633 general payments and $22,742 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $276,843 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $1,832 across 6 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

13 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $321,981 280
2024 General $355,274 280
2023 General $194,700 216
2022 General $286,682 273
2022 Research $8,942 2
2021 General $191,672 158
2021 Research $13,800 3
2020 General $115,646 125
2019 General $201,478 301
2022 Ownership $1,700 1
2021 Ownership $49 2
2020 Ownership $49 2
2019 Ownership $34 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Laura Periman
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Laura Periman were reported at $321,981. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Laura Periman Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $201,478 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $115,646 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $191,672 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $286,682 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $194,700 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $355,274 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $321,981 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $272,748 161 payments
  2. Allergan Inc. $267,369 375 payments
  3. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $181,747 137 payments
  4. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $167,685 199 payments
  5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $147,080 183 payments
  6. Alcon Vision LLC $135,263 107 payments
  7. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $102,009 121 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $81,185 86 payments
  9. Lumenis BE inc $71,271 5 payments
  10. Lumenis, Inc $51,806 7 payments
  11. Other $189,271 252 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $931,893 222 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $420,309 187 payments
  3. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $100,840 29 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $99,794 454 payments
  5. Honoraria $64,631 30 payments
  6. Food and Beverage $39,972 709 payments
  7. Education $9,975 1 payment
  8. Gift $19 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ACTHAR $272,748 161 payments
  2. Cequa $146,903 178 payments
  3. XDEMVY $133,449 129 payments
  4. RESTASIS $119,479 211 payments
  5. MIEBO $111,975 123 payments
  6. TYRVAYA $89,700 104 payments
  7. XIIDRA $77,024 93 payments
  8. VUITY $69,855 88 payments
  9. RESTASIS MULTIDOSE $67,161 64 payments
  10. TRYPTYR $66,662 43 payments
  11. Other $400,934 442 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bausch Health US, LLC $13,800 3 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $7,275 1 payment
  3. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $1,667 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 5 drugs

Part D claims

97

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$110,006

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

88.7%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xdemvy Lotilaner Brand 36 $65,137
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 24 $18,030
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 11 $16,809
Tyrvaya Varenicline Tartrate Brand 15 $9,523
Loteprednol Etabonate Generic 11 $508

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ACTHAR
$82,120 — —
XIIDRA
$40,109 11 —
MIEBO
$37,065 24 —
XDEMVY
$32,964 36 —
TYRVAYA
$12,227 15 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,638 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Washington

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record