Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Laura Lynam

Clinical Neurophysiology Tacoma, WA Medical Doctor

NPI 1295796647 CMS profile 59087

316 Martin Luther King Jr Way Ste 408, Tacoma, WA 98405

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$881

43 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Laura Lynam of Tacoma, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $881 across 43 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 44th percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $49 2
2024 General $141 2
2023 General $29 1
2021 General $96 5
2020 General $136 8
2019 General $430 25

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Laura Lynam
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Laura Lynam were reported at $49. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Laura Lynam Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $430 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $136 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $96 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $0 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $29 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $141 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $49 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LivaNova USA, Inc. $176 3 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $144 7 payments
  3. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $140 13 payments
  4. Greenwich Biosciences, Inc. $139 6 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $56 3 payments
  6. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $55 3 payments
  7. Upsher-Smith Laboratories LLC $53 2 payments
  8. Neurelis, Inc. $29 1 payment
  9. Lundbeck LLC $22 1 payment
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $20 1 payment
  11. Other $48 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $881 43 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VNS THERAPY SENTIVA MODEL 1000 GENERATOR $176 3 payments
  2. APTIOM $140 13 payments
  3. Epidiolex $139 6 payments
  4. Briviact $87 4 payments
  5. AIMOVIG $76 4 payments
  6. Vimpat $56 3 payments
  7. Zembrace SymTouch Sumatriptan Injection $53 2 payments
  8. QUDEXY XR Topiramate Extended Release Capsules $53 2 payments
  9. OXTELLAR XR $40 2 payments
  10. VALTOCO $29 1 payment
  11. Other $66 4 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 37 drugs

Part D claims

2,412

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$737,039

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

19.6%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lamictal Lamotrigine Brand 64 $105,453
Keppra Levetiracetam Brand 44 $100,893
Zonegran Zonisamide Brand 23 $93,458
Lamictal Xr Lamotrigine Brand 20 $51,488
Topamax Topiramate Brand 20 $48,952
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 11 $45,088
Rufinamide Generic 32 $40,433
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 25 $38,259
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 20 $34,831
Lacosamide Generic 207 $21,451

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 37 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$24,191

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

213

Average age 66

Services billed

361

102 women, 111 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Depression 31%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Diabetes 23%
Heart failure 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

43 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in Washington

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record