Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Laura Kinney

Internal Medicine Charleston, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1386609931 CMS profile 17214

2270 Ashley Crossing Dr Ste 165, Charleston, SC 29414

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,566

1,090 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Laura Kinney of Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,566 across 1,090 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,055 152
2024 General $3,041 155
2023 General $3,595 170
2022 General $3,382 191
2021 General $2,781 176
2020 General $2,051 128
2019 General $1,661 118

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Laura Kinney
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Laura Kinney were reported at $3,055. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Laura Kinney Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,661 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,051 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,781 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,382 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $3,595 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,041 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,055 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,007 127 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,775 126 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,612 67 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $1,520 76 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,186 37 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $910 62 payments
  7. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $905 51 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $858 50 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $790 43 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $669 37 payments
  11. Other $7,334 414 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,477 1,088 payments
  2. Education $89 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RYBELSUS $1,232 85 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,219 97 payments
  3. XARELTO $1,186 37 payments
  4. FARXIGA $1,068 39 payments
  5. Kerendia $905 51 payments
  6. UBRELVY $704 48 payments
  7. GEMTESA $621 29 payments
  8. MOUNJARO $613 26 payments
  9. VRAYLAR $574 41 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $564 32 payments
  11. Other $17,417 1,022 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 166 drugs

Part D claims

13,039

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,483,765

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.6%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 205 $299,135
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 206 $241,268
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 128 $159,844
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 82 $119,345
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 61 $97,989
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 60 $47,855
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 35 $45,937
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 40 $45,053
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 41 $37,811
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 22 $29,510

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 166 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 94 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$269,211

Of which drugs: $23,377

Medicare patients

787

Average age 75

Services billed

8,241

600 women, 187 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 52%
Osteoporosis 36%
Depression 30%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Cancer 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from recombinant dna 90673 Office 111 111 $8,918
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 31 31 $8,652
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 32 32 $4,840
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 11 235 $47
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 17 26 $23

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
$226 82 —
GEMTESA
$167 22 —
JARDIANCE
$160 61 —
Kerendia
$155 — —
XARELTO
$144 35 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

1,090 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record