Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Laura Baker

Nurse Practitioner Fort Wayne, IN Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1417213729 CMS profile 10733499

5750 Falls Drive, Fort Wayne, IN 46804

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,684

405 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Laura Baker of Fort Wayne, IN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,684 across 405 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,447 85
2024 General $1,078 60
2023 General $1,456 86
2022 General $1,420 95
2021 General $1,282 79

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Laura Baker
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Laura Baker were reported at $1,447. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Laura Baker Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $1,282 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $1,420 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $1,456 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $1,078 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $1,447 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,536 112 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,333 97 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,100 67 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $530 32 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $323 14 payments
  6. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $257 3 payments
  7. LEO Pharma Inc. $240 12 payments
  8. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $204 11 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $154 10 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $154 6 payments
  11. Other $853 41 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,084 397 payments
  2. Education $599 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TREMFYA $1,320 96 payments
  2. SKYRIZI Immunology $809 61 payments
  3. Bimzelx $663 35 payments
  4. Cimzia $437 32 payments
  5. DUPIXENT $365 9 payments
  6. RINVOQ $336 24 payments
  7. COSENTYX $331 22 payments
  8. SOTYKTU $323 14 payments
  9. SKYRIZI Immunology $206 19 payments
  10. ADBRY $196 10 payments
  11. Other $1,741 90 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

1,677

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$980,395

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

9.9%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 14 $311,563
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 16 $146,202
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 11 $145,275
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 38 $143,953
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 33 $132,670
Adbry Tralokinumab-Ldrm Brand 14 $56,815
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 191 $11,464
Gentamicin Sulfate Generic 134 $6,779
Fluorouracil Generic 81 $6,314
Ketoconazole Generic 352 $4,674

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$125,663

Of which drugs: $10,772

Medicare patients

914

Average age 75

Services billed

4,283

523 women, 391 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 42%
Diabetes 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Depression 17%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 21 33 $9,821
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 46 144 $622
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 53 510 $328

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $312
$312 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $236
$236 11 —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $180
$180 14 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $61
$61 — —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $60
$60 71 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

405 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Indiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record