Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Larry Alford

Internal Medicine Birmingham, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1386699627 CMS profile 17050

2022 Brookwood Medical Ctr Dr, Suite 510, Birmingham, AL 35209

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,184

1,543 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Larry Alford of Birmingham, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,184 across 1,543 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,215 166
2024 General $3,679 191
2023 General $4,042 240
2022 General $3,353 211
2021 General $4,206 279
2020 General $3,688 248
2019 General $3,001 208

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Larry Alford
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Larry Alford were reported at $3,215. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Larry Alford Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $3,001 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,688 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $4,206 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,353 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $4,042 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $3,679 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $3,215 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,792 205 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,389 135 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,304 179 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,080 116 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,758 95 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $1,496 91 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $1,409 78 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,177 65 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $1,167 79 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,041 64 payments
  11. Other $7,572 436 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $25,061 1,530 payments
  2. Education $123 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $2,318 130 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,774 121 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $1,494 97 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $1,402 79 payments
  5. Kerendia $1,177 65 payments
  6. XARELTO $1,041 64 payments
  7. FARXIGA $962 55 payments
  8. Repatha $875 49 payments
  9. JARDIANCE Diabetes $714 48 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $639 37 payments
  11. Other $21,720 1,349 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 241 drugs

Part D claims

24,766

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,149,186

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 297 $314,243
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 304 $291,591
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 250 $286,730
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 232 $199,028
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 189 $165,933
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 197 $151,204
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 120 $112,875
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 110 $111,180
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 97 $80,035
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 78 $76,090

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 241 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 113 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$168,115

Of which drugs: $22,689

Medicare patients

390

Average age 74

Services billed

6,289

203 women, 187 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 51%
Diabetes 41%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Depression 25%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 107 107 $8,755
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 12 12 $3,477
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 28 123 $103
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 22 88 $53
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 22 82 $34

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 41 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
$395 28 —
JARDIANCE
$225 232 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$221 197 —
MOUNJARO
$191 250 —
AREXVY
$176 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 41 with Patron

Records

1,543 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record